Discord was already succumbing to enshitification. Now with their intention to be owned by Wall Street, that trajectory will certainly accelerate at warp speed once the change of hands happens.

Anyone already get ahead of this and find a solid alternative?

Right now I’m on the fence between Element for Matrix, and Revolt. Both seem to have their pros and cons and I can’t find a clear “winner”.

  • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ah this is so exciting!

    Discord ‘existing’ has held back development motivation on Foss Federated Communication alternatives.

    When they go public only good things will happen for projects like matrix :)

    I’m very excited!

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Matrix is cool but it really suffers from complexity.

      The spec is a mess because they keep expanding it.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Let’s not mention the abysmal performance for servers. Making it largely infeasible to scale.

        It’s not the solution, not even remotely close, unfortunately.

        • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          What are you using instead? I only recently set up my synapse server and I’d be interested to head what the alternatives are

          • zedage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’ve found SimpleX a much better solution than matrix for a discord alternative.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel like matrix isn’t a one-to-one replacement. It’s a good slack replacement.

      I haven’t used matrix enough to know for sure but does it have the discord equivalent of servers?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        those are called spaces there. but there’s no flexible roles system. also no hop-on voice channels yet, but that’s a client feature so maybe that’s a bit different

  • pory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    it’s Element/Matrix if we’re lucky. Revolt is just another Discord - surely this single company will last! With Element/Matrix being an open protocol, it won’t be a “platform” you have to leave when it goes corporate.

      • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker. It means that you either:

        1. Use their servers - This requires entrusting them with your communities, just like Discord.
        2. Host your own private instance - You can control it, but the lack of federation means it’ll be isolated from communicating with other communities. This makes it really difficult to convince people to use your self-hosted servers.

        Until Revolt adds a way for different instances to federate, Matrix is really the only other option.

        • aleq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          5 days ago

          My experience with Matrix is that the federation itself is a deal breaker. I have a pretty beefy server and good connection which was getting ddosed by running Matrix and timing out on so many requests for avatars/profiles etc. Maybe I did something wrong, but the whole experience rendered me quite skeptical to the viability of it as a federated chat.

          That said I’ve had nothing but good experiences using it with big servers set up by pros.

          • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I get why Federation can cause issues (most of the time it’s moderation related), but why would an extra option be a deal-breaker? Federation can always be disabled on a per-domain basis if you prefer. In fact, I’d argue it’s best practice to only allow domains on a case-by-case basis to prevent spam and abuse.

            On the converse, you can’t enable Federation on a platform that doesn’t have it.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              They were talking about matrix itself, not a specific option. And I’m not going to lie, having to hand hold your servers federation choices seems like a hassle. At that point why not just use a self hosted, non federated option?

              • white_nrdy@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                I think the point they’re making is you can effectively have a self hosted non federated option with Matrix. Just disable federation as a whole (which I’m pretty sure is completely possible. Given companies use matrix for comms, and might not want federation, for similar reasons to what is being discussed here)

          • hobovision@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Why would an optional feature be a deal breaker?

            It also seems like an issue that could be easily solved by whitelisting.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker.

              The federation itself is a deal breaker

              Why would an optional feature be a deal breaker?

              Because the person they’re responding to said the lack of the optional feature was a deal breaker for them on a different piece of software.

      • drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 days ago

        That doesn’t really change that it’s one company hosting it. Unless you’re willing to make 10 different accounts because your super-FOSS friends aren’t willing to join each others instances?

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I guess the easy solution here to to make it use oauth2 authentication. Then you can just authenticate using one account elsewhere. If fediverse services also at some point become oauth2 providers, then even better.

          • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s still not a solution. That entails non unified communication, access, and search. Making it easy to log in to others still doesn’t solve easy sharing between others. Also oauth2 is a pain to set up, and many people hosting their own instance aren’t going to bother.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sorry but what exactly do you communicate and access between discord servers? Are you talking about PMs which are by default independent of servers?

              Unified search could easily be achieved through third party tools at the least, like for IRC. I don’t think even discord has unified search between servers.

              • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Oh hey, you’re totally right, that’s crazy. I use Beeper (hosted matrix setup) to aggregate my chats and I guess I’ve always been using that to search across all servers without realizing. Fully thought the DM search would also search across servers.

                DMs are definitely also another case though - you can’t easily DM people on another server if that requires you to log into another server.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  That’s true about DM, however DMs are not a core use-case for discord-like services. It’s the group/voice chats etc. I could see a workaround like lemmy does, where if you want to DM a user in another server, you might be able to do it through your fediverse instance (i.e. a DM simply has your fediverse instance DM their fediverse instance), but I’m sure there can be more elegant things like. However DMs by themselves are a weird thing by themselves, so much so, that even bluesky had to bolt DMs on-top and outside of their protocol.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Thank you for the recommendation. I tried element a while ago and found it lacking. Matrix must be the way forward. Disregarding IRC of course.

    • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sadly I found out yesterday:

      Matrix is not a community-based software, it was born [00] in Amdocs [01], a multinational corporation founded in Israel.

      https://hackea.org/notas/matrix.html

      Many were claiming its impossible to get contributions merged as well.

      I would be happy to find out this information is wrong or outdated.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cancelled mine when they redesigned the mobile app anyway. I don’t want a different interface on mobile vs desktop. I want a unified experience, which was their original purpose.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Matrix is the way. It’s federated and you can have your own server.

  • Forester@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Honestly, I am ready to go straight back to TeamSpeak.

    I miss hosting my own server and having full access and control over it

    I used to just host it on a piece of shit. 2003 Dell XP machine I put Ubuntu on

      • Forester@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It was so featureless back when I last used it. I don’t remember it having half the features ts3 had in 14

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Oh, it’s basic af. But it did what it needed to do, and still does, for some.

          I havent used it in ages, I have no clue what sort of stuff continued development has enabled. If anything.

          My friend group went first from Skype to the massively better TS3, and finally to Mumble. I don’t remember really missing anything.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        If they add federation I’m sold. Honestly it would be nice if it integrated with Activity Pub

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          It’s not that kind of application. Federation would be massive overkill for a project like Mumble.

          It’s a voip server and client for video gaming, with a couple adjacent features sprinkled in.

          It doesn’t even really have accounts, and adding servers is just matter of configuring their IPs. What would you even use federation for?

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hell yah, TS3 crew all the way. (Or TS5 for the zoomers…)

      My nerds herd recently also set up a cluster of Matrix Synapse servers so we got our little “We have Telegram at home” set up. Getting non-tech people to accept that this is how to find me has been tricky without sounding like a digital prepper.

      • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        : ( i was too dumb to follow the playbook correctly

        i wanna have a matrix sever!

        but I’ll use snikket for now until i skill up

        • Forester@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you try to do calculus and don’t have the understanding of the underlying math then you won’t have a good time when ansible breaks. I’d advise it’s normally better to learn how to manually install and manage software from the command line.

        • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          We believe in you, there are other write-ups and guides on how to get it working. Its was great learning expirence for VMs and Proxmox (thats what I did and it did make it harder, but I feel more confident when im cosplaying as a sys-admin)

          Guide

          This one is pretty close to whats needed, but go into it expecting each step to open a new tool/application that needs to be researched before you press enter. Also look up how to set it to a PSQL db before you start inviting users, it defaults to SQLite and that will cause problems eventually.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Why would you down-grade from Snikket to Matrix?

          If you want to skill up a bit add a Slidge.im gateway to your Snikket xmpp server to access Matrix (and Discord etc.) from there.

          • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            that is actually what I’ve been thinking. xmpp with encryption seems good enough for me! plus I’ve heard some stuff isn’t encrypted in matrix, (metadata? emojis? not exactly sure)

            i am heavily leaning towards scaling up to snikkets big brother, prosody.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The currently common older implementation of e2ee in xmpp has the same issue with only the message body being encrypted. There are newer specs of OMEMO that have better metadata protection, but its adoption in xmpp clients has been very slow.

              Prosody is more of a sandbox, with Snikket being a preconfigured version of it, but yes running Slidge will be a bit easier with a normal Prosody server.

    • SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      TS 6 looks so good. I can’t seem to figure out it’s release window though. Along with the mobile app being updated. Once those are done I plan to move over.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The problem is that performant screenshare (to multiple users) more or less requires infrastructure. That requires money, and it’s impossible to compete on price with services that have the VC-enshitification model.

      You can get around this in a few ways, but they’re all tradeoffs that are in some way or other worse than discord.

      • P2P - sacrifice latency, reliability
      • direct multi-stream - sacrifice PC performance and/or bitrate
      • paid infrastructure - sacrifice money
      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think P2P is still the way to go. Sure it’s not perfect, but it’s simpler and by it’s very nature doesn’t require the infrastructure we know will be a problem.

        Plus, don’t forget screen sharing in discord isn’t very good as is (720p30) if you’re not a paid user.

    • Prinz Kasper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      TeamSpeak recently added screen share to their TS6 beta, however it currently only works on official servers provided by TeamSpeak; they have not yet released TS6 server software, only the client. To my understanding, they are thankfully still planning on releasing it though.

    • loiakdsf@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      honestly that isnthe only thing that stopd me from going all in on teamspeak/mumble

      i just need a screen sharing solution (not necessarily built into those tools)

  • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m running a Matrix server with a FB Messenger bridge via mautrix-meta and that makes it a clear winner. Half my group chats have migrated entirely since I’ve set my close friends up with accounts in my server and they also use the bridge. The fact that people can slowly migrate chats without losing messages or groups is killer for adoption imo.

      • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I can try to write some stuff up, it’s not super complex. Core requirement for my setup is Docker + a domain. I recommend Linux host but you can make Docker Desktop work.

        Let me write some stuff down this week.

    • johntash@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Are you saying you can import chat history with a bridge some how? I don’t remember that being an issue, but would be very handy

    • Lumun@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This sounds great. If you end up writing something for the other commenter using a Linux server and the Messenger bridge I would love to hear if there were any pitfalls to avoid!

  • shym3q@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’ve started my self-hosting journey having Matrix in mind - especially the Matrix bridges to cut off the need to use social media clients like Discord.

    Today, I’m slowly convicting my friends to join my instance. So far, that’s just one of the closest ones (still win for me).

    I hope one day decentralization in social media would take off!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I JUST managed to get my closest ring outside my family to join Signal.

      We have a total of 7 people now.

      I’d light up a server and host matrix/frendica/lemmy/mastodon/headscale in an instant if I thought I could get those 7 to join.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’ve also been comparing Element and Revolt. Both seem really solid, both are open source and both are self-hostable. Hard to find any downsides there.

    There’s a discord server that me and a bunch of friends use as our main hangout. They’ve raised the prospect of bailing before things enshittify, and of course I’ve been tasked with pitching a replacement. For my money, Revolt is the way I’m going to go, specifically because it’s basically a one for one clone of Discord. The people I’m pitching this to are a mix of technical and non-technical, so I think something that looks and feels like what they’re used to will be the easiest transition.

    It also feels like Element is geared pretty heavily towards being a replacement for Slack / Teams rather than a replacement for Discord. Their pitch seems a lot more focused on the enterprise market. Revolt seems more focused on gaming, casual hangout, that sort of thing.

    I like Element a lot, but for me it doesn’t feel like the right solution to this specific problem. But if I was pitching something to my work as a Teams replacement, Element is definitely the way I’d go.

  • Turnbomb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Is there any option to stay on discord but better? Like vencord or something similar through Linux? I cannot imagine being able to get my friends off of discord ever.

    • RichardDegenne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      I guess that’s the biggest hurdle, especially when it comes to social apps. One tech-savvy person wanting to migrate is usually not enough to start moving a community, even as a small as a group of friends.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Had to experience that first hand. I tried to get my best friends to register on my Matrix server last September and join a room for our group, and they did, but I rarely see any of them online and I only get responses days later, if at all. One even stopped using it entirely, lol. Ah well, but at least I got a Matrix server out of that that I can use to federate with other like-minded people.

  • Stop Forgetting It@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    man I wish mumble had a better interface and a chat function, it could real FOSS competition with Discord, but the lack of a chat feature is holding it back

      • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s so much easier to set up and install than Matrix.

        Unbelievably so. Mumble is… basically one setup command. Don’t even need a domain. And it needs absolutely no resources, can run on a Pi Zero.
        Setting up my own Matrix server was honestly one of the most difficult things I’ve ever attempted in decades of non-professionally using computers and I’m still not sure I’d be able to properly take care of the installation if it breaks. Sooo many moving parts. All the federation-oriented projects that rely on adoption rates reaaaaally desperately need setup wizards before any other additional feature.

        • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’ve set up Lemmy, Forgejo, Nextcloud and Mastodon. Forgejo is unbelievably easy, Mastodon and Lemmy both are complex but if you follow the instructions you get there pretty quickly.

          Matrix is like “Follow a book of documentation, then when it doesn’t work anyway, spend hours of your life troubleshooting a bunch of stuff that’s NOT in the documentation. Why is this so hard?”

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Sounds like this is part of their business plan. Make hosting it so onerous, you’re better-off using their servers, or paying them to do it for you.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            You forgetting the part where the server starts using crazy resources because you entered the main Matrix chat. Does the server need to send you everything that’s ever been said? Apparently yes

    • BlessedDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Started hosting a mumble server for gaming maybe six months ago and have been using it daily. Really happy with it.

      • Stop Forgetting It@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Its been ages for me, so I may be incorrect now. I think the chat is not persistent and I am pretty sure there is no channels. Its most definitely not set up how discord is where its more of a chat client that has voice rather than a voice client that has chat.