

Carney can’t decide if he wants elbows up or not. In fact, he flipflops so much, he looks like hes doing the chicken dance.
Carney can’t decide if he wants elbows up or not. In fact, he flipflops so much, he looks like hes doing the chicken dance.
Sorry, I should’ve been more specific. Its a Pentium III Coppermine-based Celeron. Its the only chip Intel sold that ran at that clock speed.
Post it as a code block, and maybe it’ll format better?
Edit: nope. Monospaced makes it look very silly. Lol
I didn’t know either, so here you go:
The Flipper Zero is a portable multi-functional hacking device developed for interaction with access control systems.[1] The device is able to read, copy, and emulate RFID and NFC tags, radio remotes, iButtons, and digital access keys.
I gotchu fam. In this picture, @OuRKaos@lemmy.today is clearly not with Epstein:
That’s a Pentium III Coppermine CPU in there, placing it around 2000 to 2001, so that means it’ll be $1,200.
If you inflation adjust it, judging by current food and housing prices, it’s probably closer to $10k. 🙃
May you all rot in hell.
They’ve strayed so far from the teachings of their own god, I’m fairly certain that’s the biblically prescribed punishment.
Grats Saba! Now on to 2M!
Ugh. Fine, take it.
I must have been looking away, when it happened, truely unfortunate.
This is a problem that’s been brewing for a long time. Their business model is untenable at the scale they’re at without relying on near slave labour. Their massive profits come more from scale, than absolute margin, so if they actually payed a living wage they’d be in the red.
So now y’all will have to wait until the coming food shortages drive up prices before the pay is enough to interest other Americans that’d otherwise have no interest in those sorts of jobs.
The owners won’t play ball without getting their pound of flesh.
In that case, by all means. But deport him through the proper channels, not ICE nonsense.
As much as I’d enjoy the schadenfreude, you’re right. It’s impossible to take a principled stance if you only enforce it when it suits you.
I’m not sure why your so dismissive of it. It’s a heuristic that exists for a reason. Maybe you should read the wikipedia article linked above so you understand why that is.
You realise the article itself suggests that the answer to the question is in fact “no”, right? (That is to say, it agrees with Betteridges’s law.)
And that carbon capture is often pushed by the oil industry as a magic bullet?
And that we often get headlines that look an awful lot like this that are trying to push an agenda which says “Yes, it’s fine, big oil has everything under control. No need for any climate action,” right?
I’m not sure why you’re being a jackass towards people who you likely agree with.
If nobody votes for the party that actually represents their interests, then shockingly the party that represents their interests will not have a shot. It’s a self-defeating strategy.
“Strategic” voting is a long term recipe for a US-style system where there’s only room for two parties.
I suppose you’re right. It’s irresponsible to let him plead stupidity for fleecing us, when it’s all very calculated.