… was not developed by Nintendo.
Pokemon games sell, no mattersif the are/run like shit. That’s why Game Freak doesn’t put the effort in.
… was not developed by Nintendo.
Pokemon games sell, no mattersif the are/run like shit. That’s why Game Freak doesn’t put the effort in.
Good thing the Switch is very limited, I guess?
Those aren’t developed by Nintendo, but by Game Freak. Compare those to Mario Cart, Mario Odysee, Zelda BotW and TotK, etc.
You talk like Nintendo games weren’t optimized to hell and back.
just as much of a shield shoving match while trying to slash your opponents ankle as they were in Europe
lolwut? Try that leg-targetting shit with a HEMA fighter and see how fast you’ll bleed out.
Can I warn Steph Sterling, Laura Dale and Hbomberguy, before I decide?
Does Chrono Trigger by now have more “spiritual successors” than System Shock 2?
Kurzum, wenn sich hier eine neue Splitterpartei bildet, sollte diese sich warm anziehen, Beschimpfungen wird es hageln noch bevor irgendein Programm steht.
Renate Künast hat damit schon angefangen.
Liberales Hirngefängnis. Man “muss” das System “von innen verändern”. Anders geht es angeblich nicht.
You’re entitled to your opinion, but don’t confuse that with “most anarchisms”, please. Individualist anarchism is fine, but collectivist anarchism makes up a lot of the theoretic field.
why go to extremes?
Extremes are interesting sanity checks for theories
Let’s say a thief? An alcoholic …
I’m currently not interested in these examples. You’re whataboutising my point.
“collectivity” may establish rules but people who are sharing the same spaces, with or without similar world views, have no obligations to follow these rules
You have an obligation to follow the rules of a community if you are a part of that community. Also, a community has an obligation to their members. That can include protection.
Communists are more comfortable with these kinds of solutions. One shouldn’t confuse the two (while there, of course, is an expansive common ground called anarcho-communism)
I’m an anarcho-communist myself so… thanks for the explanation, I guess?
I think that more anarchisms have problems with individuals (serial killers) imposing harm over other individuals.
Collectivist anarchism doesn’t really have a problem with establishing rules, to my understanding.
confinement would still be involuntary and an imposition.
A worse imposition that being murdered by a serial killer?
Remember when it took about 20 years until a game was “remastered”? Peperidge Farm remembers.
You lied to me, Aonuma san! ;_;
I thought the flexible benchie is the octopus?
Almost as if context matters, huh? 🤷
Oof, too old school for me, sorry. 😅
Have you seen TotK, Mario Odysee, etc.?