• Draconic NEO@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think that many of the people who do depictions of prehistoric creatures lack imagination so they do the bare minimum they possibly could to “imagine” the skeleton as a living creature. Imagination is absolutely required to get a good depiction of them that looks lifelike and not creepy and unrealistic.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Any which way they go with it would be a guess based on limited information. They’re most likely going to be wrong, and if they were exactly right, we wouldn’t know it.

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Honestly they should probably do like 2-3 potential pictures side by side so readers are aware of the uncertainty.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Scrolled down to make sure someone had mentioned this! Fantastic and professional spotlight on the potential follies and pitfalls of paleontological art. And if you want to do some Lovecraft-level psychic damage to yourself, the same artist from that book has a “speculative evolution” sci fi art book called All Tomorrows in which they envision the multifarious biological forms that humans are forcibly evolved into by a malicious alien race 1 billion years from now. If you’ve ever read those Scary Stories books by Alvin Schwartz and felt uneasy seeing Stephen Gammell’s illustrations, C.M. Kosemen’s sketches conjure a similar same vibe.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yes. How fucking embarrassing would it be for the first artist to set the standard of the t-rex as this intimidating best only for into look like a phat chicken…

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        the irony of it all is that t-rex specifically seems to have been naked, and i mean naked as in it literally just had a bunch of regular skin like a plucked bird.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Great-great-great-great-great-grandmother chicken.

        And most probably females would be bigger than males and hold territories.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think the same thing whenever I watch my hens go out hunting.

        The most terrifying is watching them jump on top of a 5ft fence from the ground. Scale that up to T-Rex size. Fucking nightmare fuel.