A lot of windows errors are actually hardware acting up. Such as an aggressive overclock or random issues.

An operating system cannot prevent that

Hardware errors often cause system instability hence this is false.

Why would the law make an explicit difference? If the value is sufficiently low and an owner cannot be located with appropriate effort, take it.

Also if they still had a significant value and the owner would still like them a passerby claiming then seems injust to.me.

They still belong to the owner is the issue at hand, I believe. I.e. taking them would be theft.

The issue is that the owner is easily known.

Might be an alt.

Dass du es für notwendig hältst die Identität der Autoren so zu betonen ist wenigstens komisch.

Similar as to women’s rights a lot of injustice is less enshrined in law and more in practice and societal reality. I.e. a comprehensive picture cannot merely be based on the detail of the law.

Would an inconsistent law really be better?

It should be consistently restricted.

Without the text nobody would be able to tell. I just saw some flower.

Chinese so schlimm? Und dass eine Frau dabei war?

I guess you are a Satan’s maggoty cum fart alt?

Don’t. It will kill you. They aren’t cuddly pets.

Actually a great way to id. And cheat by using some else’s id.

Is joke “extreme heat and land use” -> “extreme land use and extreme heat”

Ok, what is extreme land use?

The letter of the law is worth as much as the paper it’s written on. And what modern society bases it’s governance on a collection of phrases?

I didn’t say it ain’t bad. It’s what the doctor/president ordered though, is it not?

Turning your back on science surely is not impeachable.

Ja.