You would turn down free bread sticks and $7M? At least eat some bread sticks.
You would turn down free bread sticks and $7M? At least eat some bread sticks.
Just need to know if they’re heavier than a duck.
Fuck that, citation needed.
I’m not imagining any problems. The difficulties I’ve outlined are genuine issues that have to be addressed. I think you’d be surprised to learn how much difference there is between a thing existing and it actually operating efficiently.
Vertical farming usually uses LED lighting, not direct sunlight.
That’s one method of bringing"sunlight" to plants. Another would be to grow them outside.
And I think the idea is that once the water is present on a given level it gets recirculated and reprocessed there, so it wouldn’t need much additional pumping.
Even if all you do is pump all the water from the floor of each level to the ceiling of the respective level, you’ve done the exact same amount of work as pumping all the water for the top floor back to the roof in the first place. Only you’ve done it with a hundred pumps and a hundred times the points of failure and repair rate as a single pump for the entire building.
You’d be so much farther ahead to just install a reservoir on the roof that gets filled by a single pump and let gravity feed the lower floors. Much the way we already do for flat farming.
And then you’ve got to make up for the inefficiencies lost in planting and harvesting. Vertical farming brings nothing to the table except a smaller footprint in a world where that’s not a real advantage.
A far better use of empty office buildings would be to convert much of the space into full-time living space.
When you have an enlarged amygdala, everything is scary. Ask any conservative what they fear most and they will never finish.
The problem is a constant fight against gravity. You’ve still got to pump the water effectively to the top of the building every day. And there’s still the issue of getting sunlight to the plants.
The question really becomes whether it’s more economical to just use traditional irrigation techniques upstream and ship the produce in vs converting a skyscraper into a very inefficient farm space.
What about Sammy Davis Jr?
Early Access karma whoring.
No, but it is raising some alarm bells.
No, but I found Waldo.
“Found my new Tinder bio”
– Allen Ginsburg
It would certainly appear so.
I haven’t actually seen it, but I hear this was pretty awful.
Maybe it’s because I am a native english speaker but your reply is offensive and embarrassing to native English speakers around the world. You can do better, America. You just have to try.
I mean… They’re not fucking wrong.
Maybe it’s because I am a native english speaker but I read this as a pledge to murder all homeless people by cutting them in half 🤔
Maybe, but as I always say, today’s “crazy conspiracy theory” is tomorrow’s news.
Only if you’re inclined to believe the conspiracy theory first.
Doesn’t mean plenty of them don’t know or care that he’s trying to put microchips in people’s brains.
What an interesting error to point out in support of pemdas.
Clearly the formatting of a paragraph of text in a textbook full of clearly and unambiguously written formulas discussing the very order of operations itself compared to the formatting of an actual formula diagram is going to be less clear. But here you’ve chosen to point to a discussion of why the order is irrelevant in the case under question.
Your example is the conclusion of a review of mathematics.
First we shall review some mathematics.
…
The actual order of differentiation is immaterial:
The fact that the example formula is written sloppy is irrelevant, because at no point is this going to be an actual formula meant to be solved, it’s merely an illustration of why, in this case, the order of a particular operation is “immaterial”.
Even if ∂^2f/∂y∂x is clearly written to mean ∂^2f/(∂y∂x), it doesn’t matter because “∂2f/∂x∂y=∂2f/∂y∂x”. So long as you’re consistently applying pemdas, you’re going to get the same answer whether you derive x first or y.
However, when it’s time to discuss the actual formulas and equations being taught in the example text, clearly and unambiguously written formulas are illustrated as though copied from Ann illustration on a whiteboard instead of inserted into paragraphs that might have simply been transcribed from a lecture. Which, somewhat coincidentally, is exactly what your citation is.
Those are skulltulas.