Proton serves privacy, not anonymity. They will not collect, harvest, analyse or sell your data. If you however use their services for illegal things they will forward whatever - usually little - unencrypted information they have about you.

It’s not a question if encryption fails, but when. Paper ballots are anonymous by design, unless you mark the ballots they are untraceable. Digital ballots don’t have that feature.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/

I am in no way antivax or anti-science, but it makes you wonder what other propaganda the US is pushing.

At best you learn some basic formatting and table calculations, there’s no need to get specific into MS word/excel. There’s essentially no difference between MS and Libre office here. Same with the operating system, if you’re just sitting in an office, reading and answering emails in a browser you don’t have to care about the OS.

Besides, school should teach critical thinking and how to transfer skills, not shoehorn pupils into specific roles and software.

In other words, if you don’t want to pay more for fast food, then you don’t actually want to see fast food workers earn a better wage.

If a business relies on exploitation, it shouldn’t exist. If paying the workers a living wage means raising the prices beyond a sustainable level for the business, this business shouldn’t exist. If a business pays out millions in bonuses to it’s executives while the workers are relying on government subsidies, the business shouldn’t exist.

In Europe GDPR gives you the right to have all your data deleted. All you do is send in a request and SO has to remove everything of yours, not just anonymize it. There are some exceptions for legal reasons, eg where financial transactions are involved, but comments should not be exempt.

In BWL lernt man zumindest Angebot und Nachfrage kennen. Dann würde man erkennen dass ein interessanteres Jobangebot die Nachfrage nach diesem erhöht. Menschen unter Scheissbedingungen da ein Jahr zu zwingen macht den Beruf nicht attraktiver.

Oder man macht solche Berufe attraktiver anstatt auf Sklaven Freiwillige vertrauen zu müssen.

Siehe Toleranzparadoxon: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toleranz-Paradoxon

Intoleranz darf nicht toleriert werden, weil Toleranz ansonsten zugrunde geht.

Nazigedankentum ist keine valide Meinung. Diesen Punkten zuzusprechen eine “Meinung” zu sein legitimiert sie lediglich.

I don’t like Canonical either, hence my recommendations for Mint or Pop being listed first. But let’s be real, if someone wants to just get away from windows and wants something that works without having to learn much new, this is good enough.

Unironically, switch to Linux. Mainstream distros like Mint, PopOS or Ubuntu are very friendly for casual users, have GUIs for everything and if something does go wrong, the error messages actually have proper meaning and you’ll find tons of resources online as well as people willing to help.

Most stuff nowadays runs in a browser anyway, so here there’s no compatibility issues, office is available in Linux through libre office and gaming has come far with steam and proton.

[Es ist] in der Koalition eine Einigung auf die Speicherung von Kommunikationsdaten zur Strafverfolgung im “Quick-Freeze”-Verfahren gelungen[…].

Es bedeutet, dass zum Beispiel IP-Adressen oder Telefonnummern nur dann eingefroren - also gespeichert - werden dürfen, wenn gerichtlich darüber entschieden wurde und auch nur dann, wenn Verdacht auf eine schwere Straftat besteht, etwa Mord oder Totschlag. Wenn sich im Verlauf der Ermittlungen zeigt, dass die Daten tatsächlich für das Verfahren relevant sind, dürfen die Ermittler darauf zugreifen.

Das klingt erstaunlich vernünftig. Nur mit richterlichem Beschluss, Zugriff auf die Daten nur, wenn sie relevant sind und nur bei schweren Verbrechen. Dann mal darauf hoffen, dass es auch so bleibt und nicht in Zukunft aufgeweicht wird. Die Schwelle, solche Dinge einzusetzen ist leider geringer als bei nicht-digitalen Durchsuchungen, das führt hoffentlich nicht dazu, dass das Verfahren in Zukunft nach dem Giesskannenprinzip Anwendung findet.

You can always compile from scratch, compare the checksums or use the version you compiled. In projects this large people usually do this, and there’s a certain level of trust that these checks have been performed.

From memory:

• In ME1 Liara has different voice lines, depending on when you decide to recruit her.
• In ME2 if you wait too long before the final mission, (most of) your crew dies which will affect the story of the last game.
• In ME2 you have to talk to your crew regularly to get them to unlock special options or abilities.
• Talk to Conrad Verner all the time in 1 and 2 and you’ll get a reward in 3.

Mint looks quite similar, and if she asks “Microsoft applied an update and now the start menu looks different.”

If all she does is browse the internet and read emails, she’ll never know the difference. You could even set up the splash screen to display the Windows logo or just disable it all together.

Both Futurama and Family Guy were cancelled early in their runs in 2002/2003 and only revived years later. Firefly was cancelled around the same time and just never revived.

In the small grocery store around the corner where I live the cashier’s are listening to music, having phone calls with their earplugs in or watching videos with their phones lying near the register. The work is boring and repetitive, customer interaction is quite minimal there anyway because they are really fast in ringing you up anyway. And that’s everything I care about anyway. They can enjoy their day a bit more and I can get to doing what I enjoy fast, too.

The total mass of reactants in the fusion chamber is below milligram, some of which is bound in stable isotopes. Even if all of it escaped, it would be far from catastrophic.
The reaction itself cannot run away on its own because it requires a delicate balance in temperature and density, which will be immediately disturbed if there was a breach in containment.

The walls will be activated by neutrons, but short of blowing the reactor up, there’s not much chance of materials escaping in a significant amount to pose a danger.

If anything has been consistent about fusion its always them desperately trying to spin babysteps and monumental leaps forward

That’s usually the media outlets sensationalising the results to the point where the articles are grossly misleading.

trying to make themselves seem super clean and safe especially compared to fission.

That’s just a fact, no need to try. The Fusion process is inherently safe the radioactive byproducts are generally short lived and easier to handle.