• Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    In the context of the comment chain, you’re saying that a person who willfully violates a monogamous marriage vow should still be able to claim alimony in the event of a divorce, simply because they informed their spouse they were doing it?

    Fuck that. What the hell are you thinking? Please tell me this isn’t what you mean.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Marriages shouldn’t be monogamous. Thats antiquated and ridiculous

      Some people get married for tax benefits, and the law shouldn’t say anything about whether or not the marriage is poly or mono. I mean, sure, let people opt into it if they want legally enforced monogamy, like a prenup. But by default marriage shouldn’t require monogomy. Thats insane.

      • Tedesche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wow. Way to give polygamists a bad name, dude. Can’t let the monogamists have their slice of happiness, huh?

        Pathetic. I’m glad you’re in the extreme minority, what a horrendous opinion you have.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I literally said its OK to be mono. Just that it shouldn’t be required.

          Also its polyamory, not polygamy