• scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    One of the options is “unilaterally subject another country to our will”. I take it that’s what you want?

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We can stop sending them our tax dollars, seeking then weapons (as dictated by our laws), and stop threatening other countries who attempt to stop this massacre of civilians. How about that?

      • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What actions does that involve? Which treaties would that break? Which other treaties can we then be ready for others to assume we’ll break? How will we respond to that in a way that prevents cascading trust collapse? Is there any way to guarantee to other allies that we won’t turn on them when expedient? How can we guarantee peace is even on the table if we’re suddenly regarded by the whole world as a betrayer? As even less reliable than we’ve already become?