• zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a real problem for renewables.

    You don’t get paid when the sun shines, and you don’t get paid for when it does not.

    You had to pay for building the solar panels and maintaining them. Corporate greed aside none sane would like their tax money either to be spent on producing electricity when it’s not needed.

    Next step for renewables must be storage that is cheap enough for it to beat having fossil fuel on standby.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Corporate greed aside none sane would like their tax money either to be spent on producing electricity when it’s not needed.

      You need to set the corporate greed aside in your own mind, too (not saying you’re greedy, saying you’ve been indoctrinated to only see life in capitalist terms). Stop thinking in “cost” or “profit”, start thinking in “benefit” and “use”. Producing electricity when it isn’t needed is only a problem when someone is looking to make money off of it.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Producing electricity when it isn’t being used is problematic for the grid. So is producing too little.

        • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Producing electricity when it isn’t needed is only a problem when someone is looking to make money off of it.

          I never said it should be. There are plenty of ways to regulate electricity production, storage, and even usage, they just aren’t considered “profitable” so are dismissed, overlooked, and or deliberately smeared and destroyed because they threaten those whose profits they would hurt.