Meant it as people will have to include AI or whatever is next in their contracts, so as to make sure companies do not just use them without permission, for profit areas.
But was it “stolen” by the book companies? I can’t access the full article, but I’m assuming some random person (who haven’t signed any contracts) trained the model on the books, which are widely available.
Right, but in that case laws are needed, not contracts.
If I were to download the Harry Potter books and use them to make a Stephen Fry AI voice, nothing in any contract would make that illegal, since I haven’t signed any.
This is more of: his potential for labor in exchange for money is being taken from him, due to robots
The fight goes back to: working class vs wealthy class (help from loyal dogs)
Looks like contracts will have to include AI jargon moving forward, so people get paid.
edit: word edit 2: AI contract jargon added
Which contracts?
Meant it as people will have to include AI or whatever is next in their contracts, so as to make sure companies do not just use them without permission, for profit areas.
But was it “stolen” by the book companies? I can’t access the full article, but I’m assuming some random person (who haven’t signed any contracts) trained the model on the books, which are widely available.
I think it may be similar to using parts of songs, royalties would need to be paid out.
Unless, they show it is fair use or different enough to not be “copyright”?
Well, in the end lawers will figure it out.
Right, but in that case laws are needed, not contracts.
If I were to download the Harry Potter books and use them to make a Stephen Fry AI voice, nothing in any contract would make that illegal, since I haven’t signed any.
Yeah, that would be under personel use.
Similar to when you buy a PC game and you add mods to it, maybe.
Buying devices and installing your own OS and apks…