The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • jimmydoreisalefty
    link
    English
    15
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This is more of: his potential for labor in exchange for money is being taken from him, due to robots

    The fight goes back to: working class vs wealthy class (help from loyal dogs)


    Looks like contracts will have to include AI jargon moving forward, so people get paid.

    edit: word edit 2: AI contract jargon added

      • jimmydoreisalefty
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        Meant it as people will have to include AI or whatever is next in their contracts, so as to make sure companies do not just use them without permission, for profit areas.

        • exscape
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          But was it “stolen” by the book companies? I can’t access the full article, but I’m assuming some random person (who haven’t signed any contracts) trained the model on the books, which are widely available.

          • jimmydoreisalefty
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            I think it may be similar to using parts of songs, royalties would need to be paid out.

            Unless, they show it is fair use or different enough to not be “copyright”?

            Well, in the end lawers will figure it out.

            • exscape
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              Right, but in that case laws are needed, not contracts.
              If I were to download the Harry Potter books and use them to make a Stephen Fry AI voice, nothing in any contract would make that illegal, since I haven’t signed any.

              • jimmydoreisalefty
                link
                English
                19 months ago

                Yeah, that would be under personel use.

                Similar to when you buy a PC game and you add mods to it, maybe.

                Buying devices and installing your own OS and apks…