• VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why is this fascism? Seems like good old fashioned religious intolerance and violence.

      Though this article skipped some details on that aspect.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Why is this fascism? Seems like good old fashioned religious intolerance and violence.

        Which, let’s be honest, tends to be best buddies with fascism…

        • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually fascism tends to be secular. The authoritarianism is derived from an extreme version of nationalism. The authoritarianism in theocracy is derived from religion. Fascism ≠ authoritarianism. There’s a lot of other authoritarian ideologies out there. Marxism is another example.

        • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The the majority of large, brutal facist and authoritarian regimes of the last hundred or two years were secular: Nazi Germany (paid Christianity lip service near the beginning but that fell off as some churches opposed and loyalty to the state became more important), the USSR, Mao’s China, and other smaller non-USSR communist regimes that committed massive atrocities (such as the Khmer Rouge)

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The Liberal party of Canada promised electoral reform (in two separate elections!) so they’re probably referring to that

        • Thelemmybud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          The ndp campaigned for it too. Parliament needs to pass proportional representation for the people so we can have more choices and more accountability.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Totally agree. I’d love to see the NDP take Parliament but it seems unlikely to ever happen with strategic voting… Probably the reason the Liberals keep going back on their promise of reform

            • Thelemmybud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well if the liberals are shortsighted they will be locked out of power forever with the conservatives under Pierre Poilievre. He threatened to suspend the charter of humans rights and liberties whenever he so pleases just like the conservative premiers like Scott Moe hurting trans children.