• blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, I mean by upholding Private Property Rights

    What does this mean though? Like if someone breaks into my house then they shouldn’t be coming over to investigate?

    enforcing racist and anti-poor laws they uphold the brutal status quo

    Is this not an issue with the laws of the country rather than the police? I feel like it would be an even bigger issue if the police just became a law unto themselves and decided on their own what they should laws they should or shouldn’t enforce.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, that’s not what I mean. I am not referring to personal home ownership, but the system of Capitalism.

      The anti-poor laws and racist laws exist because of class dynamics, not vibes. The issue is Capitalism itself.

      I am not arguing that police should just do whatever.

      • rekorse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I honestly can’t figure out what point you are making. I see a lot of buzz-words like anti-poor, racist, private property rights, status quo, etc. but I don’t understand how you think this plays out practically. The person you are replying to was asking for real-world examples of the cops defending rich white people in instances they wouldnt support poor non-white people.

        I’m not even saying I disagree necessarily, just that you haven’t answered the initial question.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          There are systemic issues core to how Capitalist systems are set up, and the violent arm that upholds these is the police.

          Does that make sense?

          • duffman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Your comment speaks to high level concepts but you didn’t provide an the example to ground it to reality.

            Like others have mentioned they aren’t seeing these examples of core issues having impacts on their day to day lives/communities. I’m not either. When it comes down to it, laws written to apply to everyone are generally enforced for everyone.

            Catching violent perpetrators pretty much always takes priority over non-violent theft. When we see acts of violence get immediate police attention it feels like the image you are trying to portay is inaccurate.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I am not referring to unequal application of the law, but the law itself and the police as its enforcers.

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Cool. Now give real actionable examples of this stuff happening. I’m not saying it doesn’t, I’m fairly sure it does. People keep prodding you for SPECIFIC EXAMPLES though, not just a definition.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The violence of Capitalism is ensured by Private Property Rights, ie Capitalists can exist. Without police, Capitalism would not exist.

                  Redlining as a concept is practiced to this day.

                  What do you mean a “specific example?”

                  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Cases where this has happened. Articles detailing actual, specific, times that these things have happened.

                    To be clear - I agree with you. I’m merely trying to point out why people seem to be talking past you, and you past them.

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ok, for one example, after the 2008 housing market drop, banks bought the debt from other banks intentionally writing bad loans, which they then resold to third parties. This buying up of the debt of the banks that collapsed during this time lead to banks pushing families out of their homes, many of which were paid-up, but the lending institution behind them had failed, in order to resell the property later, when the market prices had recovered, or use the land for other developments. This was enforced by the police. Bankers did not go around forcing people out of their houses, the police did it at their behest.

      Another is laws created specifically to punish people for being homeless. Laws like not being able to camp anywhere near a place they might be able to get themselves out of homelessness, e.g. a place with jobs, and other resources, not some place way out in the forest. These are also only effective because the police use violence to enforce them. Anti-solicitation laws fall into this category. Police often don’t realize that (speaking for my country) they are not constitutional at the federal level. Police departments that know about this tell their cops to do it anyway because it’s not like homeless people will likely be able to sue them.

      A third is the enforcement of petty traffic fines. Things like window tint, or minor violations in situations where the safety concern isn’t present. These fines are, often, the brunt of how they fund themselves. Petty violations, like tint, are also used to go on fishing expeditions, so they can either wrack-up more fines, or make an arrest, even if that means intentionally escalating the situation, lying about what happened, and giving false testimony in court. More arrests, more convictions, equals more money for the police, and the legal industry as a whole. If you work with, or around, police, like I have, you will hear them discuss things like testilying. Bouncing ideas off of each other as to how they can make bad arrests, and use illegal levels of force, while having a technicality to maintain their immunity, e.g. screaming quit resisting, while in a position where they know cameras can’t really see what is happening. This is just the tip of this iceberg, I would need thousands, upon thousands, of words to detail all the shit I have heard police say, and see police do.

      I can go on, but I think I have made my point.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m late to reply but thank you for the response, this is the kind of response and examples I was looking for.