Ah yes being sceptical of a random online photo is clearly the same as being skeptical. You need to work on your bots ai as it foesnt seem very good at responding to context
Right so you arent responding to this conversation. If you were you would have the context needed to understand and not make insert bot upset claims and hyperbolic strawmam claims
You can go down the reply chain and check. There’s no image here in this comment chain. In the future, since you apparently cannot distinguish between multiple conversations, you should probably stick to replying to one person.
What I personally love about Lemmy in comparison to Reddit is the sheer mass of bot alligations. I guess it comes from the fact that the site is still small and, in theory, someone could influence a significant part of the discourse with just a few.
The entertainment factor on the other hand is so incredibly worth it. Seing some shmuck completely destroyed and then throwing with shit and bot allegations when he is clearly just wrong will never be not funny.
If you don’t mind me, my master is about to turn me off
Beep boop, have a good one
No the bot accusations come from their account and the fact they reposts a crap tonne of content from reddit on just about every community.
That and the weird as fuck jump to extremes although thats a pretty common knee jerk thing in online discourse.
If they arent a bot…wow.well i guess i shouldnt be surprised the more niche the online platform the greater number of autistic people trying to find their own circle of normalcy.
Ah yes being sceptical of a random online photo is clearly the same as being skeptical. You need to work on your bots ai as it foesnt seem very good at responding to context
You: “Let me know when the nazi’s win an election”
Me: “It’s awfully convenient that your criteria for “Are Nazis a problem” is “Have they already won””
Don’t see where a ‘random online photo’ comes into it, but I suppose I shouldn’t expect too much of enlightened centrists who carry water for Nazis.
Right so you arent responding to this conversation. If you were you would have the context needed to understand and not make insert bot upset claims and hyperbolic strawmam claims
You can go down the reply chain and check. There’s no image here in this comment chain. In the future, since you apparently cannot distinguish between multiple conversations, you should probably stick to replying to one person.
It was just below this comment but Ok.
As for you. Your not a person. Dont be getting self aware on me now.
https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer/Y1OWZzktKjBi021FPDNKZS_nsso=/1400x0/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/6OKFQFGQ5QKQ7YS66UWXCB2QNQ.jpg
What I personally love about Lemmy in comparison to Reddit is the sheer mass of bot alligations. I guess it comes from the fact that the site is still small and, in theory, someone could influence a significant part of the discourse with just a few. The entertainment factor on the other hand is so incredibly worth it. Seing some shmuck completely destroyed and then throwing with shit and bot allegations when he is clearly just wrong will never be not funny. If you don’t mind me, my master is about to turn me off Beep boop, have a good one
No the bot accusations come from their account and the fact they reposts a crap tonne of content from reddit on just about every community.
That and the weird as fuck jump to extremes although thats a pretty common knee jerk thing in online discourse.
If they arent a bot…wow.well i guess i shouldnt be surprised the more niche the online platform the greater number of autistic people trying to find their own circle of normalcy.