• WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because if we were made of antimatter, then that’s what we would have declared to be matter, and it would still be the case that the stuff we’re not made of would be the antimatter.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      And even then, the question would still be “Why did it happen the way it did?” which is what this question is really asking…

      • faintwhenfree
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yes, question is valid, phrasing is biased and clickbaity.

        • astronomicon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Both questions are valid. Antimatter is an arbitrary label, but it is a specific thing with properties that prevent it from dominating the universe. It’s not a coin flip with the victor earning the title of matter, it’s an inevitable outcome that scientists are trying to find the mechanism for.