Misleading title, it makes you think Only Fans is doing something right, but all it says it’s plagued by AI bots and people pay to talk to AI bots. So TLDR is Only Fans is fuckedup beyond repair and officials should look that as an example on how to protect their consumers.

1337x

I have 20, but anytime an fdroid app updates I move it to obtainium. I don’t have time to review all in one go. But I’m sure the number will get to around 50 eventually when I’m done moving all f-Droid items to obtainium

I’m commenting to say, you’re doing good work around holidays. I can afford new games please do not give me a key.

Slow horses is too good

That’s how the show should always be described

Why have I not seen this in English communities. This proves it, French is better.

Thanks

Do you think you have a link for it, I’d help me in a policy paper I’m helping write.

We still have time before it crosses brownshekhar limit

If she grows 1000,000 she becomes Megga Bobby Brown

Where are all the Tankies saying China is ideal society?

For sketchy services in grey or illegal area, I’ve started paying month to month for exactly this reason.

Exactamente, no entiendo por qué es una discusión.

Wait was daft punk a pun on daft cunt, did I not know that for decades, has my life been a lie?

So keep using Firefox with some addons unless you really really want inbuilt customization? Zen seems to be more about customisation first and privacy second.

So far I’m gonna pass. My librewolf keeps me happy.

Missing article was here It didn’t contain much other than dates it was filed and plaintiffs information. Which is a standard practice anywhere.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages.[14][15][16] At the time of the suit’s filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had, “been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions”. The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing, “false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency’s reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill”.[17][14][18][19]

The article is still up, Wikipedia calling ANI biased, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International

So not really sure, why the massive outrage. Removing intricate details from ongoing lawsuits is standard practice.

While the lawsuit by ANI demands that editors who made the edit claiming ANI as govt mouth piece be identified, Wikipedia hasn’t done it yet and the article is right about setting a dangerous precedent if high court forces Wikipedia to reveal the names. But at the same time article is biased and has misleading information such as > In an unprecedented move, Wikipedia removed the page from its platform on October 21.>

You can see some well noted examples of articles being removed before from Wikipedia here . So there is clearly precedent for removal of articles. I used love vox a decade ago, but now I see these half truths/partial stories are a commonplace and I’m happy to have ditched vox now.

It’s a gorgeous, breathtaking game.

Nice poem.

Fence, Fuck fuck FUCCCCK!!!