floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoWorld’s five richest men double their money as poorest get poorerwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1856arrow-down18cross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.worldworld@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1848arrow-down1external-linkWorld’s five richest men double their money as poorest get poorerwww.theguardian.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square70fedilinkcross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.worldworld@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareacargitz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up69arrow-down3·11 months agoTaxes or guillotines. Pick one.
minus-squareSweetpeaches69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down2·11 months agoGuillotines and then tax the next ones.
minus-squarePatches@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·11 months agoBecause if we have to break out the guillotine then the redistribution is gonna happen a lot faster than taxes…
minus-squareDeiv@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoIt would just go to their next of kin. You’d have to set up a guillotine slaughter house with a conveyor belt
minus-squareskulblaka@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoI fail to see any problem with this. kicks French Revolution under the rug
Taxes or guillotines. Pick one.
Guillotines and then tax the next ones.
Why not both?
Because if we have to break out the guillotine then the redistribution is gonna happen a lot faster than taxes…
It would just go to their next of kin. You’d have to set up a guillotine slaughter house with a conveyor belt
I fail to see any problem with this.
kicks French Revolution under the rug