trevwilson@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前Glad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up11.46Karrow-down130
arrow-up11.43Karrow-down1imageGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.worldtrevwilson@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square141fedilink
minus-squarePyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
minus-squareStinkywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前Pfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
minus-squarePyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 年前Brazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
minus-squareStinkywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前You said Asians. So what about Persians?
It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
Pfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
Brazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
You said Asians. So what about Persians?