• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except it was effectively true, because banks were allowed to consider marital status as a risk factor. That was made illegal in 1974. It’s in your own article.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except it was effectively true,

          Only in the same way it was true that men couldn’t vote in the US until shortly before the Civil War. Because before that most states didn’t have state laws mandating that all free male citizens be allowed to vote.

      • ironeagl@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know what to tell you. At least one of my grandmothers needed their husband’s signature to open a bank account in the 60’s, and it wasn’t because she didn’t have assets in her name.

      • GFY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any chance you have a link to a reputable source, or a site anyone else besides you has heard of?

      • LittleHermiT
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not without their husband’s permission. That is to say, they were allowed as long as their husband was happy with their wifely performance.