I cannot imagine the world without religion, as human beings tend to be spiritual
Iām curious about this. I was raised somewhat religiously, but at this point, I canāt imagine myself with religion, or spirituality, or any of it. Why do you think itās so essential?
I think it depends on how you frame āspiritualityā. Love for example can never be meaningfully measured empirically, itās a spiritual truth. You just know it. It cannot be reliably be proven or disproven, especially across different people.
I donāt think the line between āI truly believe in loveā and āI truly believe in godā is as crisp as people would like to believe. Thatās not at all to say theyāre the same thing, but theyāre more similar than a lot of people want to accept.
Of course, but from my perspective you almost certainly do need spiritual nourishment of your own, given my broader concept of the spiritual. Purely a matter of perspective.
Which is all to say when someone like me says people canāt live without spirituality, it doesnāt necessarily imply that they feel everyone needs to believe in some kind of supernatural power.
Spirituality itself, as with anything spiritual, is a know-it-when-you-see-it kind of thing. But thatās an unsatisfying answer.
I do think āthe opposite of empiricalā is a decent shorthand. The less a truth can be objectively defined, and the less consistent the nature of a truth is across different people, the more spiritual it is.
Enjoyment of music and wonder in the face of nature / the cosmos are two more spiritual truths I think most people know.
I would class those as psychological experiences, not spiritual ones. Just because we currently lack the tools to very precisely and objectively correlate brain activity with specific thoughts, that doesnāt mean we can never quantify that at some future date.
This feels like a āspirituality-of-the-gapsā. By this definition lightning was a purely spiritual experience until we figured out that itās electricity. Our lack of understanding on a subject doesnāt make it magic, itās just something we donāt understand yet, and thatās ok. The laws of physics existed long before humans existed to describe them, and theyāll continue to function long after weāre extinct.
Correlating brain activity to thoughts is not the same as being able to distill love or emotional experience down to objective understanding. The difference is spiritual experience.
Oxytocin is a part of how people experience love, but it will never be possible to objectively assess whether someone is experiencing love by measuring it or any other physical quantity.
We can measure the wavelength of light and track how it stimulates cone cells and the brain, but we will never be able to measure the spiritual experience of color.
It is science that will always be chasing the āgapsā in measuring spiritual experience. No matter how closely we can measure ourselves physically, the actual spiritual experience will always transcend it.
Trying even to describe spirituality at all is difficult because itās an inherently nebulous thing. It can only be known, never proven.
I respectfully disagree. Thereās nothing inherently preventing a future technology thatās able to objectively measure personal experiences, since we donāt have any evidence to suggest that thoughts and experiences happen anywhere other than physically in the brain.
Thus-far unobserved spirits are an unnecessary addition to the neurochemical processes we know to occur in the brain and know to drive thinking. By Occamās Razor, an evidence-based worldview must reject these unnecessary assumptions.
Also, no, science is not āfilling gaps in spiritualityā. The claim that there are spirits is the positive case, and bears the burden of proof.
One individual can live with religion or spirituality in religious form, but not humanity as a whole. There were experiments in totalitarian countries to violently exterminate religion, they didnāt end up well. Usually itās brainwashing and freedom of conscience denial
Oh Iām certainly not advocating for forcing anyone to get rid of their religion (Iām not advocating for anything at all). It just struck me as interesting that you canāt imagine a world without it.
Iām curious about this. I was raised somewhat religiously, but at this point, I canāt imagine myself with religion, or spirituality, or any of it. Why do you think itās so essential?
I think it depends on how you frame āspiritualityā. Love for example can never be meaningfully measured empirically, itās a spiritual truth. You just know it. It cannot be reliably be proven or disproven, especially across different people.
I donāt think the line between āI truly believe in loveā and āI truly believe in godā is as crisp as people would like to believe. Thatās not at all to say theyāre the same thing, but theyāre more similar than a lot of people want to accept.
I personally donāt think something is spiritual just because it canāt be measured.
Of course, but from my perspective you almost certainly do need spiritual nourishment of your own, given my broader concept of the spiritual. Purely a matter of perspective.
Which is all to say when someone like me says people canāt live without spirituality, it doesnāt necessarily imply that they feel everyone needs to believe in some kind of supernatural power.
Interesting, how do you define spirituality?
Spirituality itself, as with anything spiritual, is a know-it-when-you-see-it kind of thing. But thatās an unsatisfying answer.
I do think āthe opposite of empiricalā is a decent shorthand. The less a truth can be objectively defined, and the less consistent the nature of a truth is across different people, the more spiritual it is.
Enjoyment of music and wonder in the face of nature / the cosmos are two more spiritual truths I think most people know.
Thatās fair, I personally wouldnāt use the word spiritual for those things either, but I think it just comes down to a difference of opinion.
I would class those as psychological experiences, not spiritual ones. Just because we currently lack the tools to very precisely and objectively correlate brain activity with specific thoughts, that doesnāt mean we can never quantify that at some future date.
This feels like a āspirituality-of-the-gapsā. By this definition lightning was a purely spiritual experience until we figured out that itās electricity. Our lack of understanding on a subject doesnāt make it magic, itās just something we donāt understand yet, and thatās ok. The laws of physics existed long before humans existed to describe them, and theyāll continue to function long after weāre extinct.
Correlating brain activity to thoughts is not the same as being able to distill love or emotional experience down to objective understanding. The difference is spiritual experience.
Oxytocin is a part of how people experience love, but it will never be possible to objectively assess whether someone is experiencing love by measuring it or any other physical quantity.
We can measure the wavelength of light and track how it stimulates cone cells and the brain, but we will never be able to measure the spiritual experience of color.
It is science that will always be chasing the āgapsā in measuring spiritual experience. No matter how closely we can measure ourselves physically, the actual spiritual experience will always transcend it.
Trying even to describe spirituality at all is difficult because itās an inherently nebulous thing. It can only be known, never proven.
I respectfully disagree. Thereās nothing inherently preventing a future technology thatās able to objectively measure personal experiences, since we donāt have any evidence to suggest that thoughts and experiences happen anywhere other than physically in the brain.
Thus-far unobserved spirits are an unnecessary addition to the neurochemical processes we know to occur in the brain and know to drive thinking. By Occamās Razor, an evidence-based worldview must reject these unnecessary assumptions.
Also, no, science is not āfilling gaps in spiritualityā. The claim that there are spirits is the positive case, and bears the burden of proof.
One individual can live with religion or spirituality in religious form, but not humanity as a whole. There were experiments in totalitarian countries to violently exterminate religion, they didnāt end up well. Usually itās brainwashing and freedom of conscience denial
Oh Iām certainly not advocating for forcing anyone to get rid of their religion (Iām not advocating for anything at all). It just struck me as interesting that you canāt imagine a world without it.