- cross-posted to:
- Europe@europe.pub
- cross-posted to:
- Europe@europe.pub
ROME, March 22 (Reuters) - Negotiations on a potential contract between Elon Musk’s satellite internet operator Starlink and the Italian government have stalled, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions, Italy’s defence minister said on Saturday.
You must log in or register to comment.
deleted by creator
They will literally do everything except just installing freaking fiber cables
deleted by creator
You’re on a 50 Gbps connection and you want more?
deleted by creator
The confusion/sarcasm is because you say 50k mbit --> 50 000 mbit --> 50 gbit.
deleted by creator
No, I think you mean 50 megabits per second. I’d consider 100mbit (megabits) average, 50 000 megabits, which is equal to 50 gigabits (or ⅛th of 50 000 megabytes) would be ludicrously unnecessarily much for a residential connection today, and it’d be hard to find hardware to support it.
Just for reference:
-
Modern DDR5 Random Access Memory can be bought for 8000 mega transfers per second, which is pretty high end. According to wikipedia, this is roughly 64 gigabytes per second.
-
PCIe 4 SSDs can reach up to 7GB/s or 56 gigabit/s of data transfer speeds. PCIe 5 drives cap out at roughly 16GB/s or about 128gb/s.
I don’t think your internet would be quite that fast, or at least you wouldn’t be complaining about it 😅
-
Wow, even some african nations huh?
Removed by mod
Morocco and Egypt are pretty well developed.
Egypt? Where women are afraid to be outside their homes?
With modern wireless technology, fiber isn’t even necessary. 5G is cheap and easy.
Fiber needs to be run to the towers. It’s easier to install more towers but it’s still an expense.
No, towers can be connected wirelessly with each other.
Wireless trunking can do 10GBs . Fiber does 800GBs. Chaining more towers means more are funneled through that last 10GBs link.
We are comparing against Starlink, dude.
StarLink does fiber back haul from base stations. So it’s either your Telco spending the money or StarLink. Your Telco doesn’t want to spend the money because it comes from customers and would require rate hikes that are regulated.
Whereas StarLink is spending its investor’s money.
Every major powerblock will build their own constellation. The need is there, but there is no way that the militaries will give that amount of control to the USA & Musk now. Musk switched of starlink in a critical phase for Ukraine and that was the dead of the program for militaries outside of the USA
No, because for 99% of applications byoubdont need low latency satellite internet. A single geostationary satellite works wonders
That single satellite is toast at the start of every major conflict
Nah. Very few nations have the capability to strike satellites.
Shocking. I thought fascists would have the back of other fascists .
