• ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    And life is not something people have a right to create

    Yes they do?

    Having children is literally the one thing most of us are equipped to do, and those who cant can adopt; the children of the future are our responsibility to raise. You seem to have a pretty self centered and unrealistic idea around child rearing; people raise children through invasions, unless you want to stop people from fucking somehow you’re never going to stop reproduction.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Most of us are equipped for rape and murder, but we don’t have a right to it.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          45 minutes ago

          “because that would be eugenics” is not an explanation. You’re just asserting that eugenics is bad, which is begging the question – this is a post about the ethics of eugenics. You can’t just come in and say “eugenics is bad because it’s eugenics.”

          Anyway, I don’t think anyone is calling China’s former One Child Policy eugenics.

          • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 minutes ago

            Thats because the one child policy was coerced by the IVF in order for China to survive during a period of economic isolation, more so the one child policy only applied to han Chinese, and many still choose to have children, it wasn’t a ban on having extra children, they where just heavily disincentivized and given access too birth control.

            Literally banning who can have sex would be eugenics yes