• ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are there any danes here, that could chime in? The idea of having an almost entirely digitized society feels so scary to me. Everything having mobile apps, no cash? Feels like a horror story given the implications on privacy. I couldn’t even run most of the the so called secure apps on my lineageOS. My bank knowing exactly when I payed how much money for what would be so dystopian to me. Are there other methods available to protect your privacy in Denmark? Or does there truly not anyone give a shit about their digital footprint?

    • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is still cash, as well as a national credit card provider.

      Digital footprint is not something many people are concerned about. Possibly this has something to do with the strict protections offered by GDPR. Digital processes have also been normalised after all interactions with the state became digital. Trust in the state is high.

      Not saying people shouldn’t be concerned, they just don’t seem to be.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You can use cash for everything below $3000, this limit is to prevent things corruption and whitewashing.
      Cash is legal tender, and can’t be refused as payment.
      It’s true we are very digitized in everything like communications with public systems like Tax etc. and also businesses like banks.
      Almost everything is done digitally. An we have a secure system for electronic mail, which is also used for signing papers.

      It is a requirement to have these systems, But there are exceptions, if you for some reason can’t use the digital services, you can be exempted.

      PS: It will still be possible to send letters after “Post Nord” stops the service. There are other companies that still have this service.
      But Post Nord is the old Monopoly company that was traditionally used for it exclusively.

      PPS: Personally I’d really like to get rid of the physical mailbox, I very rarely check it for mail, because in the 6 years we’ve been living here, I think We’ve gotten about 5 letters, 2 of which were for the previous owner!!

      • ISOmorph@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Same here. My country is a lot more analog, so everything from bills to ads still gets delivered via mail regularly. But I would love to have a digital infrastructure for mail delivery. However the costs to make it secure and private seem too high, every attempt by the state to make progress on that gets shut down due to concerns and therefore lack of adoption. Additionally, with the rise of the right and looming threats to your privacy, like chat control, a lot of people have no trust whatsoever in the government

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          We don’t even receive much digital mail either.
          Payments are automated, and includes invoice and receipt. Removing all mails that have to do with payments.
          Most is SMS and e-mail, because it’s good enough for most things.
          But where security is needed, like signing a bank loan, we have the system for that too.

    • ventrace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Dane here.

      Indeed it’s essentially impossible to minimise your digital footprint because there is no cash.

      • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        there is no cash

        This is false. Cash still exists and can be used in a wide range of businesses. It may not be the norm, but it definitely still exists.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This is so blatantly false, IDK how any Dane could believe this???
        We do absolutely have cash, and it’s legal tender, which means cash can’t be refused as payment.
        Except we also have an anti corruption law, which states we can’t make cash payments above $3000.
        So that’s kind of weird?

        • robbinhood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I imagine OP isn’t saying that there literally is no such thing as cash in Denmark but something more nuanced like “cash is becoming rare.”

          No idea about Denmark’s laws but there are companies (edit: I mean “countries” not companies) where cash is yes still the legal tender but payment at some businesses can only be made cashless. Denmark may have a law stating businesses must accept cash, but you can certainly have systems where cash is legal tender but some businesses will not accept it.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            you can certainly have systems where cash is legal tender but some businesses will not accept it.

            Not by normal laws, legal tender means you have to accept it. It’s not just that it’s not illegal to use. Credit cards for instance are NOT legal tender, meaning a business does not have to accept them, but you can use them almost everywhere.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_tender

            Legal tender is a form of money that courts of law are required to recognize as satisfactory payment

            • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Traditionally legal tender means that a person / entity has to accept it for the payment of a debt - i.e. they can’t refuse cash and say you didn’t pay them because you didn’t use some other method.

              However, in many retail scenarios there is no debt - there is an exchange of payment for goods, and so the traditional common law legal tender rules do not prevent retailers from refusing that exchange (i.e. customer doesn’t get the goods, retailer doesn’t get the money, the transaction just never happens) on the grounds of payment methods.

              Some places have additional laws on top of legal tender that might require retailers to accept cash.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Eh OK so Singapore have rules that are different. But as I clearly linked, that is not the “normal” definition.

                • robbinhood@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I do agree it’s “not normal,” especially in the West. It does seem to be significantly more common across Asia.

                  And I suspect it’ll become more common across the West.

                  And I hate it. Cash is still king for me for whatever reason.

                  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Cash is still king for me for whatever reason.

                    Yes, I think that’s just a matter of time, what government can refuse the ability to follow all money transactions?
                    Of course we have privacy regulation, and especially regarding banks for some reason. But it only takes a court order to get it anyway.
                    It will soon be very difficult to have illegal money, without a digital footprint.

                    Cash is still king for me for whatever reason.

                    Cash is just inconvenient IMO, before mobile pay we used it privately with friends and trading 2nd hand. But it’s been years since I’ve used cash at all, although I still carry around the equivalent of $100. Just in case of being stranded somewhere, and there are disruptions of digital payments.

            • robbinhood@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              My friend I’ve been to countries where businesses don’t accept cash and the currency is still considered legal tender.

              Like, I’ve (literally) turned up at coffee shops, tried to pay in cash, only to be told “we don’t accept cash, only credit card or digital payment.” (the latter in my experience is often via QR codes and the system sucks because 10 second transactions become 25 second transactions)

              The legal frameworks in such jurisdictions may be very different than Denmark’s.

              Edit: Beyond which, does Amazon accept cash? eBay? I’ve never heard of them doing so and don’t recall ever seeing the option.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                OK then per the user isomorph post I responded to, we have better options to minimize digital footprint than such countries.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            cash is becoming rare.

            That is absolutely true, but as I mention it’s still legal tender, and you can use it everywhere, with very few exceptions.
            You should not be much inconvenienced if you want to use cash, as OP stated for privacy reasons. And you can also still use and receive snail mail.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          We have a national system called danlort, which is used by most people.
          We also have a 100% danish phone payment system called MobilePay that is almost universally accepted,

          So Visa is only necessary for international trade.

          And we absolutely still have cash, which is legal tender, meaning cash can’t be refused as payment.

        • robbinhood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Can the USA even do that? They’re global companies. As whacky as the United States is right now even attempting to do so would be immensely irrational even by Trump’s standards.

          I’d guess that Mastercard and Visa would shift their headquarters to somewhere like Switzerland or Singapore pretty quickly after that.