Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 16 hours agoThis one's for my minecraft rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down13
arrow-up1125arrow-down1imageThis one's for my minecraft rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneCornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agowe can’t truly 100% accurately conceptualize 4d shapes, but 3d shadows of 4d objects is piss easy and basically good enough
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-211 hours agoI think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true. Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects. My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.
we can’t truly 100% accurately conceptualize 4d shapes, but 3d shadows of 4d objects is piss easy and basically good enough
I think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true.
Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects.
My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.