A new study on Gen Z men revealed that Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson are among the most trusted influencers.
It also found that 52% of UK men believe a āstrongmanā leader is needed to improve the country. Meanwhile, this article highlights how the right has been incredibly successful at indoctrinating young men into their ideology.
Why the hell is right-wing content so much more effective at gaining support? And why do left-wing influencers consistently fail to do the same? Iāll tell you why: we decided that social issues should take precedence over everything else, and by so doing have thrown all nuance out the window in the process.
The leftāand I donāt want to hear Marxists bitching about how progressives āarenāt really leftistsā because this kind of in-fighting is part of the fucking problemāneeds to radically rethink its approach. Right now, the priority isnāt pushing our agenda. Itās stopping the worldwide fascist takeover.
And yes, this might mean abandoning identity politics entirely, as it is largely responsible for driving people away from the left and toward right-wing populism.
We need left-wing influencers who can effectively use populist tactics. We need less extremism from the progressive left, because in our obsession with social issues, weāve lost the plot. We need to refocus on the economic needs of the people and stop alienating those who would otherwise support us.
The clock is ticking. Germanyās elections are coming up, and Elon Musk has already shown support for the AfDāthe most far-right party in Europe. If we donāt correct course now, weāll soon be living in a world where fascism dominates and equality is a pipe-dream.
The (modern) Left is a big tent thatās founded on diversity. It promotes a multitude of voices and viewpoints, with none able to rise to the top.
The (current) Right is the opposite. It aims towards an ideal. Individual voices suppress their own diversity and attempt to speak with one voice. This naturally leads to the elevation of charismatic figures.
The serious thing handicapping the left from having a Joe Rogan is that the left as a homogenous group only accepts leaders that are absolutely flawless and perfect in every way.
The instant there is a flaw that is found in any potential leader, the left invades that flaw, makes it the overriding characteristic of that person and destroys them because they do not allow flawed leaders.
Of course, they also donāt allow leaders to be perfect, so they will tear them down for being obsequious or condescending or obsessed with always being right all of the time.
As soon as you can find somebody who is both flawless and also not so flawless that they are kicked out of the group for being flawless, then you can have your leftist strongman.
I lament the loss of Al Franken.
Jon Stewart, John Oliver
I suspect that the right played up a lot of culture-war issues into major parts of the leftās identity, and was carefully and conspicuously silent about a lot of the economic and regulational core that used to form the backbone of the left. And, the left bought it, and obediently tried to set a counterpoint to particular ignorant stuff the right was saying, and spent all their time talking about trans issues and the value of inclusion and safe language. Is that important? Absolutely, we need to fight for it. Does it win elections? Is it important enough to justify stepping away from working peopleās issues and environmental issues that used to be the core, and translated into concrete governmental action that would make a compelling argument for why this particular person is better suited to run the country in ways that 99% of the country can understand and agree with? Wellā¦
And so the left āinfluencerā space is talking about things that, outside the people who want to make politics a particular and strong element of their identity, people generally donāt give a shit about. Whereas, Jordan Petersen and Joe Rogan are talking about how to actualize yourself as a person, the tension between āfree speechā and corporate overreach and government censorship, and other things that a lot of people care about. Even if their solutions and framings are bullshit, itās what people like to hear. Itās not a lecture, addressed to someone who is being defined as ābadā if they donāt agree with the message.
Thereās also a significant factor that malicious people invest tons of money into promoting the right-wing thought leaders, whereas any particular influencer on the left is more or less on their own to promote themselves, painstakingly building a small audience year by year, without huge boosters attached to anything and everything they want to do.
Exactly. The right dictates the battlefield, and the left obediently marches onto it. We follow like their lapdogs and push back against their own agendas instead of forging ours. This always happens. Instead of setting our own agenda - focusing on worker issues, wages, housing, and healthcare - we keep reacting to right-wing provocations. Now left-wing politics is all about what itās against than what itās for. The core of our platform should be based on our economic and environmental prospects and policies rather than playing up culture wars that are secondary to the issues at hand.
Whereas, Jordan Petersen and Joe Rogan are talking about how to actualize yourself as a person, the tension between āfree speechā and corporate overreach and government censorship, and other things that a lot of people care about
This is a crucial failure on our part. Right-wing influencers make their followers feel empowered - like theyāre unlocking hidden truths about the world. Meanwhile, too many left-wing influencers have taken the approach of āmy morals are better than yoursā rather than educators or motivators. If we want to win, we have to stop lecturing and start leading.
Thereās also a significant factor that malicious people invest tons of money into promoting the right-wing thought leaders
I agree, but that doesnāt mean left-wing populism is doomed. Leftist movements have thrived without major funding because they connected with peopleās material concerns. Instead of relying on corporate funding, we should be building mass grassroots networks, leveraging crowdfunding, and focusing on organizing rather than just content creation. There are already people like Bernie Sanders who represent our sentiments on the grander stage, however where are his supporters? Theyāre mute in comparison to the right-wing supporters.
There are already quite a few left-wing content creators and influencers, but theyāre responsible for the same moral gatekeeping i criticized earlier. We need the Ben Shapiros and the Charlie Kirks of leftism.
Yeah. Although I wouldnāt discount the significant of having wealthy backers, or not, in setting the landscape. The only leftist influencer I can think of thatās really talking about these issues is Jon Stewart, with this as a shining example of what the conversation should be looking like on the left:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeheoxWzf2o
Why is that relegated to an oddball Youtube channel, which is obviously nowhere in my recommendations because of course it isnāt, such that I almost would have missed it if not for seeing it on Lemmy? Because Apple told Jon Stewart to stop pissing off China, and he told them to go fuck themselves, and so he had to switch platforms.
Also itās significant that for a lot of Democratic politicians, itās a hell of a lot easier to talk about performative issues of social justice, in ways that are only ever pretty indirectly connected to specific policies, than it is to talk about issues of economic justice and get angry phone calls from the super-wealthy people who finance all their campaigns and operations.
Jon Stewart is one of the few left-wing figures actually making the right arguments (although i havenāt seen that specific video), and the fact that he got pushed to the margins for it proves that media conglomerates donāt want real leftist messaging getting mainstream traction. This is why we need independent platforms, community organizing, and alternative funding sources. The right didnāt build their media empire overnight, and neither will we, but we have to start.
get angry phone calls from the super-wealthy people who finance all their campaigns and operations.
This is exactly why corporate-backed liberals love identity politics. It lets them appear progressive without challenging the structures that keep the wealthy in power. A perfect example is how corporations slap rainbow flags on everything in June but continue union-busting, exploiting workers, and funding right-wing politicians behind the scenes. This shit is right in our faces but weāre blindsided to see that weāre only dancing to the tune of conservatives.
Right Wing Content - Is never fact checked by its audience, as long as it aligns with the brand of hatred they follow it Left Wing content - Is always fact checked by the audience, requires thinking skills, comprehension skills
This doesnāt mean that left-wing populism is dead though. There can absolutely be left-wing movements based on facts that appeal to the majority
the left wing āinfluencersā I can name off the top of my head:
- J.T. (Second Thought), Hakim, & Yugopnik (The Deprogram)
- Cody Johnston & Katy Stoll (Some More News)
- Roz, Liam, Nova, & Gareth (Well Thereās Your Problem)
- Jake Flores, Alex Ptak & Anders Lee (Pod Damn America)
but yeah none of them use the types of manipulative communication that got Tate and Peterson so famous in the mainstream, for better or worse š¤·āāļø
It sounds like youād enjoy and find useful George Lakoffās Donāt Think of an Elephant.
- A comprehensive video https://youtube.com/watch?v=n4UfGZOPJjE
- A shorter video https://youtu.be/w2u06oCxfv8
- Another short video https://youtu.be/8mQjC1Evcf0
Edit: His most recent edition of the book not only talks about frames, but also institutional incentives, as well as the history of Republicans and why they have succeeded in framing and Democrats havenāt.
Thanks for this resource! I didnāt know this was something that had been previously well articulated.
last I checked they were marching on every major city in the united states during the spring and summer of an election year, when everything hung in the balance, calling the incumbent democrat president āgenocide joeā vowing not to vote for him, while chanting āfrom the river to the seaā, which may have had the effect of not only freaking out middle america, but all of it. it sure as fuck suppressed the democratic vote. and now we have trump again. seems there are no left wing infulencuals or intellectuals left, they all decided to turn in their liberal bonafides to protest jews in favor of islamofascist terrorist. you canāt make this shit up. the jokes write themselves.
