• rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminder that the West Bank is the one that’s not even ruled by Hamas and hasn’t attacked Israel. If Israel tried to do this under Harris, no doubt weapons would’ve been cut off and the US might have even favored sanctions.

    • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol why? Gaza is illegally occupied too.

      Thousands of dead babies wasn’t enough for her or Biden. Rafah was a red line apparently and now Rafah doesn’t exist

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Legality” in this situation is completely irrelevant. The only law that would limit Kamala is the laws of politics. If she opposed intervention in Gaza, this would be the political equivalent of a frontal assault against a battleship. She’d be accused of helping Hamas, a bipartisan bill would be passed undoing whatever she does against Israel, and she’d be endlessly attacked by all sides in the media. If she opposed Israel annexing the West Bank, only the most extremist zionists would be against her on it for the reasons I stated.