• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, actually, they are. Most of the people getting arrested or causing problems are the ones who need housing the most. There is a near 0 chance to get any of that under control without safe and secure housing. First step is a home, and then they can start rebuilding. Ideally, we’ll implement some other social structures, like transportation, medical, counseling, and job aid off the top of my head, but that’s all downstream from housing.

    Most problems with the homeless come from those who have something going on, either a mental or emotional episode, or a need they have that they cannot meet realistically, legally. Just having a safe space to have your episode, without judgement from every asshole coming down the street will drastically decrease the odds of a negative event occurring.

    This also all applies to your invisible homeless group, why wouldn’t it? They’re homeless too, come get a home and get back on your feet.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This also all applies to your invisible homeless group, why wouldn’t it? They’re homeless too, come get a home and get back on your feet.

      Absolutely it does! That’s why those are the people you specifically target with things like a housing-first approach or just straight up money because that’s all they need and can take it from there. I’m pretty sure they make up the majority of homeless as well so it can do a lot of good so the sooner we get on it the better. Check out this trial that was done in Vancouver for example that deliberately excludes the more entrenched people for that reason.

      article

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think we’re agreeing, but aggressively at each other lol. For the record I’m all for including the more well-off homeless (that sounds weird to say) in any initiatives. I don’t think I agree with explicitly excluding the more entrenched, but both groups probably do need different resources, and so it’s not entirely as simple as just give em all cash or a house, but I think in both cases it’s the FIRST step to take.