• Sentrovasi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it’s even more abhorrent to claim to “critically support” something while being ignorant, as you claim to be, of what you’re supporting. In what world does ignorance and being critical go hand in hand?

    Saying you’re a critical supporter, then backpedaling to say you’re just asking questions, either suggests wilful ignorance, which is the worst kind of disingenuity, or plain laziness in endorsing things you don’t care enough to know about, which in the age of internet-fuelled extremism is arguably worse.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The old tankie dilemma - are they assholes or just incredibly stupid?

      Trick question, it’s usually both.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really didn’t claim any support, as I mentioned to someone else it was a “they say this”, “no, it is more accurate to say they say this” situation

      • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re trying to characterise it as such now, but saying “emphasis on the critical” - that’s your input suggesting that this support had merit. Hardly just saying it’s a different terminology. You’re backpedalling again.

        Regardless, a lot of people have chimed in explaining to you exactly why this is so damaging and how little merit your qualification has. If you’re as uneducated on the whole situation as you seem to be, why are you so unwilling to accept that it’s probably wrong?

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The emphasis on critical was meant to suggest hesitatancy or the acknowledgment of nuance to their actions not necessarily my personal beliefs. I do however believe that NATO had a lot to do with the start of this was as I’ve quite recently discovered since the beginning of this thread.

          As for my argumentative nature, I don’t like when my words are misinterpreted and used to claim things I did not say so it made me instinctually hostile. I also have trouble just letting things rest or ignoring situations. Anyway I’m working on educating myself I just think strawmans are dumb