Did you even read the article? Jury nullification has nothing to do with being guilty or not. They even say it in the article.

This article doesn’t talk about whether he is guilty or innocent.

So again, how do you have the slightest clue if this guy is guilty or not? Public “opinion” doesn’t matter here.

What evidence do you have that suggests he is innocent?

I’m not even saying that he’s guilty or innocent. But rather NONE of us have the facts. From where you sit you cannot say he is innocent or guilty. Why people sit here and declare he is guilty or innocent is nonsense and it just shows your bias.