• @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    16 months ago

    12 is arguably a better arithmetic base than 10 since it divides nicely by 2, 3, 4 and 6 instead of just 2 and 5.

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      I wish some countries would go this way and use 12-based as a default, while others would use 8-based because it’s closer to computers, and others will continue using 10-based.

      And then no-one will denote the system used because it’s the default, how’s that you don’t understand. Oh what a beautiful world we’d be living in 🥰

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        06 months ago

        The point is that there are benefits to several different arithmetic bases for different purposes and forming some kind of dogma around any of them is weird.

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          There is no dogma, when doing maths you’re free to use anything even as esoteric as Fibonacci base. The problem is when this becomes widespread but not everywhere.

          If you’re for using it “for different purposes” I can’t even understand the point of your original comment, why preach?

          • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I am definitely not the one being preachy about a particular base. I am the one advocating flexibility over dogma.

            All I did was point out that 12 is easier to divide cleanly than ten, and this very simple fact has pissed many people off for some reason.

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Right, having more whole, proper fractions to work with can also be simpler (and more precise) than truncating decimals and dealing with the implications of significant figures. I just don’t understand why people are so hostile to this as a basic idea. Base 12 has benefits, just like base ten does.