Relevant article about some mad lad who actually did it:

https://money.cnn.com/2016/01/29/technology/google-domain-purchase/index.html

What about rogers center? Or even Roger’s place?

God there are so many of them

In 1980, he was murdered by a Christian fan of the Beatles, Mark David Chapman, who later cited Lennon’s quote as one of his possible motives in the killing.

This is a solid song to do drugs to

From Wikipedia:

Due to his adherence to an approach to politics called Realpolitik, which prioritizes pragmatic geopolitical considerations over moral or ideological values, Kissinger has been criticized for turning a blind eye to war crimes committed by American allies during his tenure.[6]

A number of activists and human rights lawyers have sought to prosecute him for war crimes committed by American allies during his tenure.[8][150] Kissinger has been associated with such controversial policies as the U.S. bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam War, U.S. involvement in the 1973 Chilean military coup, a “green light” to Argentina’s military junta for their Dirty War, and U.S. support for Pakistan during the Bangladesh Liberation War despite a genocide being perpetrated.[255]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger

I can’t believe they wouldn’t give you access to their genetic code… smh my head

There isn’t a way to check if you’re connected to a Bluetooth device through automations :/.

The best you can do is set an action after you connect/disconnect from a known Bluetooth device

Well that’s very cool, best of luck to em!

I hope you’re right, but vr worlds still seem far off to me. I can see it working if either synthetic data is better than expected, or they have the funding to create the training data manually.

To my knowledge, there arnt large free repositories of vr worlds like there are for text and images, so I expect progress to be a lot slower. Still cool tech none the less, I wouldn’t have thought it ti be possible before reading this article.

Hiber said the goal of adding AI is to help creators build more expansive online worlds, which are often referred to as metaverse platforms.

It seems like they want to capitalize on two recent trends; hopefully it can provide optimized worlds that can be used for more than just VR chat, but I have my doubts…

From the creator of arkenfox.js

AF (arkenfox) vs LW (librewolf) AF enables SB (safe browsing) and uses mozilla’s API key. LW doesn’t have a SB key (edit: note AF does block real time binary checks) AF updates same as Firefox. LW has no updater in windows AF can use any language, LW is limited to en-US AF restricts cross-site referrers by default LW ships with uBO - AF users have to do that manually and add/flip the two recommended filters as per the AF wiki So basically everything you see at Arthur’s independent test site at https://privacytests.org/ for LW applies to AF along with referrers (navigational) with a green check as well

https://github.com/mullvad/mullvad-browser/issues/1

Does anyone know if there is a nottheonion community on lemmy?

Well it sure is a good thing they are making everything smart nowadays….

But seriously I can’t believe how fast the car industry locked previously free features behind a subscription

Thanks for the recommendation, that looks pretty sweet and it’s FOSS so I’ll definitely check it out

Something something Skyrim horse armor something something….

Free Open Source Software

So any software where the code is public and the license allows for you to use/edit/redistribute (in some cases) for free.

You should be able to assign that vlan to a port (ex. eth0, eth1)

Just wanted to add this link explaining how to use tunnels in a more privacy respecting way

https://help.nextcloud.com/t/is-cloudflare-tunnel-safe-privacy-focused/150268/2

Problems with TLS (free option of routing on cloudlfare tunnels)

interception (or HTTPS interception if applied particularly to that protocol) is the practice of intercepting an encrypted data stream in order to decrypt it, read and possibly manipulate it, and then re-encrypt it and send the data on its way again. This is done by way of a “transparent proxy”: the interception software terminates the incoming TLS connection, inspects the HTTP plaintext, and then creates a new TLS connection to the destination.

You can use the WebKit (Safari’s engine) wrappers made by Firefox and Chrome - but can’t use truly independent browsers

But how can it trust you’re a person when it just confirms that you’re running an in-modified site. It takes a hash of the site, then make sure your local view of the website matches that hash.

This disables add blockers, custom css, etc; but I don’t see how this standard would prevent bots…