• 7 Posts
  • 435 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 24th, 2024

help-circle

  • That’s kind of the point, that show ended 28 years ago. What have you seen him in since then? When he’s been mentioned in the years since, it’s generally either to make a joke about his career or just his general persona.

    30 Rock in 2006: In this episode, Jenna Maroney goes on a sexual walkabout, engaging in a bunch of deviant sex acts. At ~3:45, we see the very end of her checklist:

    • In an airplane wheel well
    • Pull a general Tso’s Revenge
    • Run a train with the cast of “Training Day” on a train
    • Soon-Yi a marriage
    • Supreme court Justice,Liberal
    • Yoko a band
    • Dean Cain

    Once the band has been Yoko’d, she scrolls down to the final entry. “Ugh, Dean Cain,” she sighs, rolling her eyes.

    Family Guy in 2007: Dean Cain is so desperate for attention that he’s taken to wearing old Superman merch and sidling up to random strangers then saying “Hey, is that Dean Cain?” in a fake voice.




  • This show was not even a year and a half old when it made the departure of a series regular genuinely hurt. Taking to school a certain well-known space opera that tries and fails to do the same thing literally months later, a franchise that The Orville was suppose to be a parody of.

    It also put me in mind of the way a certain character fairly unceremoniously left early TNG. That was still season 1, but episode 23, so technically further into the show than we are here if you’re counting in minutes. And it was much worse. The Orville absolutely gave a masterclass here.



  • Without wanting to get into too much behind-the scenes drama, there may or may not have been some interpersonal stuff behind this episode. Halston Sage (Lt. Alara Kitan) and Seth MacFarlane (Capt. Mercer) were at one point in a romantic relationship, and then they weren’t any more, and then Alara left the series. Nobody has outwardly connected those things in a causative sense; in public, the explanation was simply that this was the right story for the show. I find that a little hard to justify, though, and promptly …

    Future episode spoilers

    … replacing her with a new Xelayan …

    … smacks of allowing rewrites of future scripts which expected her to be available.

    That said, this episode itself is very strong (even if Alara isn’t!); it doesn’t feel like a rush job in any way. Alara’s family (and old friend Robert Picardo again) initially seem a bit one-note with their “Military bad” attitudes, but are revealed to have more depth as we spend more time with them, in part through their almost complete helplessness when confronted with a stressful situation. It’s a shame it took this to get them to find respect for Alara, but that’s families for you.

    Something I frankly never noticed before was that Halston Sage has no Xelayan prosthetics in the fantasy sequence where she rides an Eevek (Xelayan horse thing) on the beach, as seen in the thumbnail of this post. This was included in the script, confirming that it’s not a production mistake. Alara picturing herself as happily human gives her some additional depth. She’s an outsider in both Xelayan and human society, so this represents one of the paths she could take to finding a place.

    It’s a fantastic farewell to a character who I wish we got more time with, an arc cut short by … something. The only problem I have with the episode–besides it including Alara’s exit-- is a minor one: the grieving-cum-vengeful parents appear comically villainous (e.g. when threatening to start lopping off Solana’s fingers: “Which one, sweetie?”). I think they could have been given a slightly less scene-chewing evil that didn’t take so much relish in violence. There’s no room left to sympathize with them, because they’re just awful. Maybe that’s to soften our feelings about the Kitans. They could be worse!







  • vaguerant@fedia.iotomemes@lemmy.worldPokeGENDA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 months ago

    I checked, whoever CONEY is isn’t saying these things, it’s a reaction video making fun of the satanic panic around Pokémon. That’s why in the profile pic he looks like one of those dudes who would make an outrageous reaction face in the thumbnail, because he usually does. No shade, except for the obvious shade.

    EDIT: I’m watching the OG video (35 damn minutes); favorite pull quote so far:

    The danger of Dungeons & Dragons or any kind of role-playing game like this is that it’s played with the mind and–when played with the mind–the mind begins to lose that fine line with what’s real and what’s fantasy. And the more you get into the fantasy world, the more it seems real and all of a sudden now, you don’t know what’s real or what’s not.

    Seems like.

    EDIT2: Hold up though, is this guy working undercover for Prima Guides or something?

    And now, parents, if you’re not up on Pokémon, you need to be. And one of the things you can do is go out and buy the official Pokémon Trading Card Game Player’s Guide. And you can get this at any store that sells any of the Pokémon stuff. I mean anything. You can get it like at Toys ‘R’ Us or any of those places that sell any of the Pokémon.


  • From a behind-the-scenes perspective, the most important thing to note about this episode is that it’s actually from season 1. If you thought it was weird that the first season had 12 episodes and the second had 14, instead of the more common 13-episode season, here’s your answer. I don’t think we’ve had any formal explanation of what happened, but MacFarlane did say that 20th Century Fox’s corporate board raised a note about the network broadcast standards in relation to this episode. Maybe it was just too sexually arousing to air.

    It was originally supposed to air as episode 12, so despite jumping seasons, it’s really only been shuffled down two episodes. They did have to reshoot the scenes with Topa in them, because there is supposed to have been a small time jump between seasons and season 2 Topa is older than the child they filmed with previously. It’s interesting to think that this episode was originally intended to air before “Ja’loja”, as you might have expected this episode to change that one. Then again, that episode showed deceptively little of the Bortus-Klyden relationship.

    Spoilers for Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 3, Episode 21 "Hollow Pursuits"

    This episode’s plot is quite reminiscent of TNG’s “Hollow Pursuits”, with a crew member (ab)using the holodeck/simulator in questionably horny ways to relieve stress in their personal life. A major advantage this episode has is that we already know Bortus, while TNG’s equivalent episode created Lt. Barclay whole cloth for that episode. I feel this is a strength offered by The Orville’s tone: TNG was probably hesitant to depict one of its established characters as addicted to holo-pornography, while The Orville wasn’t.

    While I ended up really enjoying Lt. Barclay, I do think it’s tough to find him likeable in that first episode, primarily because of the ways he uses his fellow crew members in his fantasies. I wonder if The Orville took any lessons from that: Bortus’s fantasies all appear to involve entirely fictional characters. Speaking in present-day terms, what he’s doing is closer to standard porn, while Barclay was engaging in something akin to deep fakes of his co-workers. But maybe I’m reading too much into the parallels or lack thereof.

    I think this episode is missing something as far as exploring the repercussions of Topa’s reassignment. We don’t seem to get any indication that that is at the root of Bortus’s porn addiction until the episode is about 2/3 complete. As a viewer, you might bring that context with you, but if the show was peppering in any foreshadowing about it, I didn’t catch it. The episode is kind of goofy and jokey for the first 29 minutes, then we get the reveal and finally have something to really bite into.

    The conclusion, with most of the potential refugees forced to remain on the planet and die, reinforces the tonal shift in the last third of the episode. We get a touching farewell from First Minister Theece to her partner and child, a scene which deserves a better episode. Ultimately, I just don’t feel like the comedy is really integrated very well into this episode compared to some of the others we’ve seen. There’s so much here for the episode to dig into, but it’s all dumped into the final act instead of throughout.

    Ultimately, this one feels like a missed opportunity. I don’t hate it or anything, it’s no “Cupid’s Dagger”, I just feel certain there’s a better episode buried inside this one.

    At least we get this exchange:

    Lt. Malloy: “Captain, we have another problem.” Capt. Mercer: “Oh, neat, what is it?”






  • I watched the eight-part miniseries Washington Black (US: Hulu, CA/UK/AU: Disney+). It’s a sort of swashbuckling 1800s steampunk fairytale of a Barbadian boy (the titular George Washington Black) who escapes the life of slavery he was born into using his scientific aptitude and a fantastical airship. I have somewhat mixed feelings about the depiction of life within the show’s universe, but going any further than that strays into spoiler territory. Overall, it was fun to watch. Sterling K. Brown is a major standout in the cast, but everybody is doing good work.

    Below I’ll go into a bit more detail about the things I liked less. It’s fairly minor spoilers, mostly about things that don’t happen in the show, but if you don’t want to know anything going in, skip it.

    Spoilers

    Presumably in service of being “fun to watch,” the realities of slavery and racism in the era are glossed over and sanded down significantly compared to the novel it’s adapting or actual history. There are a few threats of gratuitous violence but probably the worst thing that happens is a slap, which is bad but on the lower end of awful things that might happen to a slave. Nobody in the show’s universe seems to know any racial slurs. There is an over-representation of enlightened, abolitionist white men, although they are for the most part deeply flawed, not idealized white saviors.

    I don’t mean to give the impression that the racism is entirely whitewashed. There’s at least one unrepentant slaver, several malevolent slave-catchers, a light-skinned, mixed-race character is forced to disguise their parentage to continue living in wealthy, white society. But the show’s focus is mostly on the fun parts: the adventures, romance and airships, with the less palatable stuff frequently only implied or occurring off-camera.

    Overall, I’d say it’s what you might expect from a Disney(-ish) fairytale adaptation of darker source material. It just feels a little weird when the elements that were dropped are the harsh realities of 1800s racism and not … little mermaids dying (Hans Christian Anderson spoilers). Again, I had fun watching it, but I feel conflicted about how healthy it is to make historical fiction fun by softening the harder edges. Who knows, maybe it’s OK to have some escapist fiction with PoC protagonists, as a treat?

    For people who have seen Nautilus (US/CA: AMC+, UK: Amazon Prime Video, AU: Stan), I’d say that’s a better show, as far as swashbuckling steampunk adventures which try to engage with the racial dynamics of the (fictionalized) eras they represent. But both shows are very enjoyable, quite short and easy to watch. Go watch Nautilus.



  • For those who didn’t follow the link:

    But what was the reason for Henry’s condemnation by the University to five and a half centuries of infamy? It was a murder. In 1242 he and a number of other men of the town of Oxford were found guilty of murdering a student of the University. Henry and his accomplices were fined £80 by King Henry III in May 1242 and were made to leave Oxford as a result, forced to stay away (and allowed no closer than Northampton) at least until the King returned from abroad.

    Further research is needed to discover the exact details of what happened here but it seems that Henry Symeonis had bought the King’s pardon and his permission to return to Oxford. The King was willing to allow his return if the University agreed to it. But the University refused and chose to ignore the King’s order of 25 March 1264, resuming its hostility to Henry Symeonis. In fact, it felt so strongly about it, that it gave Henry Symeonis the unique honour of being named in its own statutes, making the University’s dislike of him official and perpetual.