Striking and unionizing is more powerful.

Climate change is a changing process. China and Africa can do alot to build forests for carbon capture and maybe create a timber industry that can be carbon negative. Hopefully we can do something like that in South America. A lithium economy is emerging and maybe just the ecological contraints will just make capitalism stop making sense. Capitalists will make decisions based on faulty assumptions. Being delusional is not a good way to keep power for long. The contradictions between assumptions and reality lead to bad decisions.

White or fair skinned people have more colors in their skin than dark skinned people. Also some white people are darker than supposedly “colored” people. The whole thing seems nonsensical.

I personally never liked tik tok, but I’m morbidly curious as to what shenanigans those bastards will do to make it worse.

Yea. I felt like it would be a better miniseries. The plot felt compressed.

As long as they can support a family on a wage without a college education, this is fine.

The basic analytical model of intersectionality states that one can have one or multiple minority statuses.

I see it as that I am what I am and don’t care if what I do is seen as masculine or feminine.

1 I think this can be verified for all public companies.

2 Corporations are taxed at a lower rate than individuals. Individual managers and CEOs are often paid in stock options which is buying stock from the corporation at a below market rate and selling the stock on the market for a normal price. For this they pay a 15% flat tax.

3 Sorry but its worse than that. Many major corporations are price fixing. https://goodjobsfirst.org/illegal-corporate-price-fixing-conspiracies-are-widespread-in-u-s-economy/ That certainly helps GDP go up.

4 I don’t have an issue with the math, its often with the definitions and how they are collecting information that gives those paying for the studies a means to justify what they are already doing.

depends

If it annoys the audience to organize then it is agitprop. It ought to agitate to organize movement in the real world.

There are the left tubers that shamelessly want to just grow an audience, but discourage any practical action towards the overthrow of capitalism. These influencers are not making agitprop. (Vaush)

TLDR

Its good to learn things. Its good to apply oneself in earnest to the universe to see where they are wrong in practical tests. Both success and failure teach you how the world works. Its better than presuming there is nothing to learn and nothing will ever change.

Perhaps your comprehension skills will improve if you lay off the pot.

You sound like a Gnostic that believes that they are having a personal battle with the Demiurge. There are the rules of “spirit” also known as common sense that confine what nature can be. However the rules of matter often discover that the world is stranger than our cultural ancestors presumed and we should update our understanding accordingly. A more accurate understanding helps one understand why something exists. Knowing why something exists can tell you how to make something not exist. This applies to living things, people, societal concepts and all other things. To give up on the concept of understanding is to relinquish one’s power to those that want to keep power. It is the common sense of the spirit that fights understanding that truly limits ones power and freedom more than the limits of matter.

I’ve never understood this. I’ve never wanted to do that kind of thing.

We don’t believe in “personal responsibility” crap for virtue signalling. We seek to build what is better for society, but as individuals you can choose what is best for you personally now. Get your government to fund their public services properly if you can.

Generally we don’t support them but when the 5% chance the dice rolls on a 20 for a 20 sided dice we have to support them. That’s critical support.

Yea that is worded kinda poorly.

I know that many corporations dumped industrial waste in Indian reservations, but IDK what what that has to do with the federal reserve. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-talk-reservations-about-toxic-waste/

I know that the Nazi’s admired the US’s “manifest destiny” against indigenous peoples and applied it to eastern Europe as “libenstram” https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=aQ7cidL4N9k

“Fake school holocaust” might be refering to the ethnic cleansing of indiginous people to either get beaten to death or forget their original language. These “schools” were brutal. Many died. https://time.com/6177069/american-indian-boarding-schools-history/

Putin is not a socialist. Will they just be duganist? Maybe some basic lessons in humanity like killing ethnic minority civilians shouldn’t be celebrated?

Not with Putin but maybe later?

There are 3 kinds of people. People that don’t want 100% free speech without consequence, the other kind of person lies about wanting 100% free speech. The third sensible kind wants speech regulated to some degree but not too much.

In both bourgeoisie and socialist democracies it is good to give people a means to vent their frustrations and hopefully reform or respond to the concerns of the people. Opposing the masses of people with concerns that are legitimately hurting the people is an act of hubris that is not good for the stability of the government. I think it is reasonable to regulate/call out misinformation or campaigns wholly based on misinformation. Ideally, media companies must vet out to not report misinformation because it undermines the ability of the people to assess real threats to their democracy.

To the extent of the country is in fact a democracy representing the people, it is of great priority that the people not be lead astray with false information easily. For this reason, Bourgeoisie democracies often tell falsehoods. Bourgeoisie institutions in general spin narratives to divert the problems capitalism causes onto false scapegoats to keep the Bourgeoisie corporations in power. Socialist institutions that represent the will of the people and accountable to those people have no incentive to spin false narratives in the media. Problems can exist, then they are addressed eventually.

If you can have faith in a god that you acknowlege is a social construct to direct people to what is in the interest of humanity, yes. You’ll have to acknowlege that everyone is responsible for creating the new forms of good and those forms of good are not static.