

terrorist drone attacks have been an absolute certainty for a while, it’s very surprising that they haven’t become common already
do not blame me for the dogshit takes
terrorist drone attacks have been an absolute certainty for a while, it’s very surprising that they haven’t become common already
“This is apparently Beijing trying to leave the impression that the Trump wants to talk. Beijing publicly doing so indicates the phone call is drawing near,” said Neo Wang, lead China economist and strategist at Evercore ISI.
Thank you for this brilliant analysis, Mr Wang. Western “China economists” stay dumb as hell.
Run For Their Lives, which organized the walk, said, “This is not a protest; it is a peaceful walk to show solidarity with the hostages and their families, and a plea for their release.”
The journalist gets an F for not immediately asking what this person thought the best way to free the hostages would be. Guarantee it wasn’t ceasefire now.
Jamming, security forces on base with shotguns for point skeet defense, etc
Zoning laws that local government might control, sure, but zoning laws your corporation controls are two thumbs up from porky
“I think we’re running out of patience too with Israel"
Uh, hello, bawk bawk, Jim Shitnails from National Enquirer, ah, bawk bawk,
Do the people around you find you as embarrassing as you present on the internet?
yes you did
How many names do you have? Is it just one name, like, “Joe”, or “Susan”, or “Scorpion” if you’re a cool dude in a leather jacket? Or maybe do you have more than one name, like maybe a family name, because just the one name isn’t really specific enough? On the edge of my seat, please let me know.
Oh no, you’re on to me
I have independently verified that you’re a clown.
I didn’t request podcasts, I have asked you many times now for the names of the people making the claims but curiously you refuse to provide them. It’s almost like you know it’s bullshit and you’re afraid of anybody checking up on it.
you linked to podcasts you clown
but I’d rather share independently verified rather than anecdotal information.
Correction, you’d rather link to podcasts instead of providing actual information
So you’re scared of anybody being able to check up on your claims and won’t provide an actual full name of someone making these claims to prevent anybody from being able to investigate the individual. You’re gonna need to work on your tactics because this is pretty pathetic, but if you keep it up I am sure somebody at USAID would take a look at your resume once their budget has been sorted out again.
You don’t have full names?
the uyghurs in the podcast are not being paid for their interviews.
Yes that would be how it usually works, the “journalist” can therefore pretend to not know the individual they are interviewing has a stipend to do their speaking tour, paid for by the NED or some other CIA/State Department appendage.
Are you playing dumb or just not getting it? I asked you to show me an individual making the claims who has not been paid to do so. You linked to a fuckin podcast, instead of providing a name. I am once again asking for the name of the individual making the claim. This should be extremely easy for you if you’re not just making shit up and wishcasting.
holy shit I didn’t ever consider this possibility
imagine being so far up your own ass that you have to be snide to the people in the country you’re visiting on vacation