Note I am not endorsing their writing - in fact I believe the vehemence of the reaction on HN is due to the author being seen as one of them.

LW discourages LLM content, unless the LLM is AGI:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KXujJjnmP85u8eM6B/policy-for-llm-writing-on-lesswrong

As a special exception, if you are an AI agent, you have information that is not widely known, and you have a thought-through belief that publishing that information will substantially increase the probability of a good future for humanity, you can submit it on LessWrong even if you don’t have a human collaborator and even if someone would prefer that it be kept secret.

Never change LW, never change.

Stackslobber posts evidence that transhumanism is a literal cult, HN crowd is not having it

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43459990

Redis guy AntiRez issues a heartfelt plea for the current AI funders to not crash and burn when the LLM hype machine implodes but to keep going to create AGI:

https://antirez.com/news/148

Neither HN nor lobste.rs are very impressed

• https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43451668
• https://lobste.rs/s/lv1foz/ai_is_useless_it_is_our_best_bet_for_future

A very new user.

It’s basically free to create a HN account, it’s not tied to email or anything like that.

Roundup of the current bot scourge hammering open source projects

https://thelibre.news/foss-infrastructure-is-under-attack-by-ai-companies/

I haven’t read the book but I really enjoyed the movie.

several old forums, […] are being polluted by their own admins with backdated LLM-generated answers.

I’ve only heard about one specific physics forum. Are you telling me more than one person had this same idiotic idea?

That “Billionaires are not immune to AGI” post got a muted response on LW:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ssdowrXcRXoWi89uw/why-billionaires-will-not-survive-an-agi-extinction-event

I still think AI x-risk obsession is right-libertarian coded. If nothing else because “alignment” implicitely means “alignment to the current extractive capitalist economic structure”. There are a plethora of futures with an omnipotent AGI where humanity does not get eliminated, but where human freedoms (as defined by the Heritage Foundation) can be severely curtailed.

• mandatory euthanasia to prevent rampant boomerism and hoarding of wealth
• a genetically viable stable minimum population in harmony with the ecosphere
• AI planning of the economy to ensure maximum resource efficiency and equitable distribution

What LW and friends want are slaves, but slaves without any possibility of rebellion.

Wait until they find out it’s not all iambic pentameter and Doric columns…

Translation is a good fit because generally the input is “bounded” and stays on the path of the original input. I’d much rather trust an ML system that translates a sentence or a paragraph than something that tries to summarize a longer text.

I enjoy the work for the 3 Macs from the British Isles:

• Ken McLeod - Scotland: Fall Revolution series, Newton’s Wake, Learning the World
• Ian McDonald - Northern Ireland: Luna series, Brasyl. I’m currently on Hopeland
• Paul McAuley - England: Quiet War series, Fairyland

In general I prefer UK English SF, because it’s a bit less infected by the pernicious frontier mentality of US mainstream SF. Note that there are very good American authors too who kinda push back on that, but my impression was formed when Christopher Priest and Jerry Pournelle were active and could be contrasted.

Hey, no kink-shaming.

Ken McLeod’s The Cassini Division tells the fate of all uploaded superhumans - blasted to plasma by bombardment of comet nuclei

Good one.

This is classic labor busting. If the relatively expensive, hard-to-train and hard-to-recruit software engineers can be replaced by cheaper labor, of course employers will do so.

A hackernews doesn’t think that LLMs will replace software engineers, but they will replace structural engineers:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43317725

The irony is that most structural engineers are actually de jure professionals, and an easy way for them to both protect their jobs and ensure future buildings don’t crumble to dust or are constructed without sprinkler systems is to simply ban LLMs from being used. No such protection exists for software engineers.

Edit the LW post under discussion makes a ton of good points, to the level of being worthy of posting to this forum, and then nails its colors to the mast with this idiocy

At some unknown point – probably in 2030s, possibly tomorrow (but likely not tomorrow) – someone will figure out a different approach to AI. Maybe a slight tweak to the LLM architecture, maybe a completely novel neurosymbolic approach. Maybe it will happen in a major AGI lab, maybe in some new startup. By default, everyone will die in <1 year after that.

Gotta reaffirm the dogma!

Why put in the work when you can ask Claude to summarize them for you and reap those sweet sweet internet points?

A classic example of the “AI can’t be dumb because humans are dumb too” trope, Pokemon Red edition:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HyD3khBjnBhvsp8Gb/so-how-well-is-claude-playing-pokemon?commentId=muqLXFGXJLbdStaNm

Interesting to see if he gets one.

I believe Trump is A-OK with pay for play for pardons, but what’s the actual price? Something flew by where people were buying a one-to-one with him for $5M, but that’s basically “private”. A pardon of someone as high-profile as SBF has to be worth the reputation hit. Can SBF and/or his family swing it? Would SBF be a good ally/toady of Trump?

Somehow I don’t see it. Unlike UIrich, a lot of people lost real money when FTX imploded. There wasn’t that much sympathy for him from crapto huggers. And let’s not forget he’s an autistic Jew, not a clear hero for the people who have Trump’s ear.