Here’s a popular video. I want you to keep in mind the skull on that cap is the Totenkopf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToKcmnrE5oY

The Untermenschen in Iraq and Afghanistan which you consider subhuman.

The US was hoping to create an AI dystopia with all jobs automated but instead we got dystopia without the job automations.

It’s an entirely different religion but the sentence doesn’t change that much.

Discord cloned Slack. Fluxxer clones Discord. It’s clones all the way down.

If she replaced the word Mormons with Jews this suddenly reads a lot differently

HIV exists because someone had intercourse with a chimpanzee so that might be a part of it.

Well not the BBC. They believe there’s “Trump criticism” instead of a ceasefire deal

And we’d have Liberals explaining how it’s actually all perfectly legal according to the law and there definitely isn’t a two-tiered justice system

I did a quick check on Epstein partner Peter Mandelson and he’s still out of prison and classified as “not a flight risk”

Is this the “military grade reliability” I keep hearing about?

I don’t believe he’s dead

Yes they had no military leverage left and decided to strike a bad deal.

Palestinians haven’t struck a deal. The second Western support for Israel collapses, the whole Apartheid will collapse. And at that point Israel will have no claim to any of the land. It all belongs to Palestinians.

Israel can do a 1948 deal right now if it wants to. Even Hamas said they are willing to accept that extremely bad deal. But Israel doesn’t because they are an expansionist genocidal ethnostate believing they can colonize more. So that is their gamble. And by taking that gamble, Israel still has no right to any land at this very moment. And if they ever lose their military advantage before striking a deal with Palestinians, then they lose all the land they colonized with it.

The natives struck a deal with the US. Palestinians didn’t. South Africa didn’t give the Apartheiders a state. One mistake South Africa made was not completely disowning the colonists. Palestinians don’t have to make that mistake.

You’re basically advocating for genocide in a different way with a different winner. That’s not a sustainable or realistic outcome.

Oh no not a “reverse genocide” apologist. You can’t do genocide against colonists. That’s called decolonisation.

You can blame the Brits too if you want to get technical but it’s mostly the US these days.

And a genocidal expansionist Apartheid around the corner is realistic? Like keeping Nazi Germany around the corner after 1945. Surely that can’t go wrong. Your idea is much less realistic.

In the end you or I don’t get to decide what happens to Palestinian land or what’s realistic. Only Palestinians get to decide that. And unless they themselves give up their land voluntarily to Israel in exchange for some peace deal, all of the land still belongs to them. They are still fighting to get it back to this day who are you to tell them “Israel stole their land fair and square”?

Probably the WEF or another of those huge capitalist organisations you hear recurring in tinfoil hat conspiracies.

Double nice

Nice

But not on Twitter