he does not think about lemmy, we should likewise think of him less
side account of sangle_of_flame@lemmy.world
he does not think about lemmy, we should likewise think of him less
fr
Reddit Exodus: “reddit is being corporate and shitty and greedy, time to bounce”
Facebook shows up: “oh, let’s let them; in fact, we should be happy that they’re coming to the fediverse! only good things can come from this”
like it’s as if y’all forgot the thing that just happened; why are you all so quick to give the corporation that only cares for money a chance
you are an example of why they’re so strict about it
I mean, it was never “in favor”; as far as I know, it had always been a slur
I can’t see how OP was “failed by moderation”; I assume the instance they were on had a zero tolerance policy for such language, and honestly someone with a blog on the internet that had a twitter account probably should have known that that word was a slur and still is
maybe they’ll realize why they got banned and figure out that “jokes” like that aren’t tolerable, but with how they reacted here I don’t know
I’d think that most OG lemmy users were people like that, so it’s not “small”
imo, the dicey part of the matter is “what amount of the AI’s dataset is made up of actual images of children”
exactly what I was thinking
and on top of that what happens with a proven bad actor
would they be allowed to just jump to a new instance to harrass people?
you actually think corporations will always keep their word, don’t you
and that somehow Google acting like it does is like some fluke or one bad apple or something, rather than Google acting in ways very normal and common to corporations
tbf, that’s every social network isn’t it?
they’re actually asking, so be serious
wait, again??
drug joke, I think