For the love of God Bibi just don’t refer to it as a “special military operation”.
For the love of God Bibi just don’t refer to it as a “special military operation”.
Nobody hated on Nimoy for In Search Of.
That show opened with a firm disclaimer that it was all speculative.
Hancock does say his ideas aren’t mainstream, but it’s framed more like a conspiracy by academics to hide the truth.
I agree with you in general that you can have light entertainment shows about “unsolved mysteries” without falling into the trap of peddling pseudoscience.
Most of the blame for SpaceX’s dominance can be laid at the feet of Boeing.
Two ways to do something, the right way and the Janeway.
Credit where credit is due, that device was sublime in it’s ingenuity. It took the CIA almost 20 years to build their own!
I’m not sure it’s a law per se but more guidance that schools should endeavour to serve children a balanced diet which will include portions of meat/fish/poultry/dairy.
Says party donor who happens to own vegan catering business that supplies schools.
This article doesn’t explain exactly why the statistical anomaly should be inadmissable in court.
Were they asking for it to be inadmissible? My take was the RSS are implying the court allowed the jury to be misled as to its significance by not having a statistician on hand to explain it. It’s almost an exact replay of what happened in the Lucia De Berk case, later overturned and since described as “the greatest miscarriage of justice” in the Netherlands. Worth a read if you’re interested.
You canard be serious
It’s a classic https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0120157/
It’s uncanny how much of it exactly mirrors what happened to Lucia De Berk.
This is the plot of an old Kurt Russell movie.
He said wrong answers.
Depending on how much explosives went up, it could be in the running for one of the largest man-made non-nuclear explosions.
Yes, thank you for the polite discourse.
That’s true I suppose. His motivation does not appear to be altruistic but if it was a case of diverting limited funds, I can see his excuse not to fund this being reasonable.
I mean I’m not doubting the minister is a bit of a homophobe but I don’t think it’s wrong to focus aid on the disabled.
“As far as Ukraine is concerned, the humanitarian aid side has focused more on the disabled, the elderly and so on. It’s a question of focus,” the minister said.
That sounds…reasonable?
It’s a bit mad that we aren’t allowed to know who owns it.
Stop thinking of them as people, they are just meat space for brands. Like a billboard or those little posters above urinals.