• 3 Posts
  • 129 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 19th, 2023

help-circle



  • The fact that the dollar and the euro are the world’s reserve currencies allows both America and the EU to do 2 crucial things.

    Firstly, whenever a country prints money (they don’t exactly, the money supply increases when banks give out loans. Countries can loosen lending requirements/costs), it acts as a tax on everyone holding the currency, because the value of products purchasable by that currency is spread over more currency.

    Since everyone holds dollars and euros, American and European banks are able to tax the world. The same applies to their treasuries, which increase the money supply by running deficits (financed by borrowing from their central banks).

    Secondly, these countries can sanction individuals, organisations and countries by cutting them off from exchange markets (as described by soviet entropy), and by cutting them off from the swift banking system (which is tech to transfer financial messages/transactions internationally).

    These are the 2 fundamental tools of imperialism, and practically define it. The role of currency in empire is so important in fact that the first currencies were invented by ancient empires to tax subjects.

    BRICS becomes an obstacle to the American and European empires by offering financial alternatives, and allowing countries to, if they choose so, to free themselves from imperial currencies. But this capability hasn’t been fully developed yet.






  • Nato is as much a “mutual defense” pact as sea lions are lions. These guys bombed Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq and countless other nations. The members of Nato have repeatedly cooperated with each other, using the military networks built through the alliance to wage proxy wars, perform coups, destabilise regions of the world at a scale never before seen in human history.

    You might as well call the axis a mutual defense alliance lmao.



  • But there are some in this thread who would pretend Harris is more pro-genocide than Trump, which is demonstrably false.

    Is it? She’s the one who is the VP of the organization funding the genocide. I don’t recall Trump directly funding genocide, even going out of his way to circumvent US law. Maybe he did, wouldn’t put it past him, but given the information I have at least, Kamala and Joe Biden are demonstrably, empirically more pro-genocide than Trump, who remember, has already been president in the past.

    Literally the entire political analysis of liberals on this issue is based on nothing but vibes. Trump is worse than Biden/Kamla on genocide because he has more bad guy molecules in his brain of some dumb shit.



  • You still didn’t answer the question.

    He did, you just lack reading comprehension.

    The ruling elite was the Communist party, mostly people near the top who were able to obtain key government positions that they would exploit for personal gain especially in later years of USSR.

    The Latter years of the USSR are notorious for being fucked, but this does not address the middle or early years.

    Mentioning that some guy was Ukrainian with in the regime while not mentioning Holodomor is OG 🤡

    Ah yes, the famine which affected all of the Soviet Union (and Kazakhstan more in terms of deaths per capita) which even the inventors of the narrative of genocide (Robert conquest) no longer call genocide.

    Must he nice being a communist while enjoying benefits of western society lol

    I love the benefits western society! I get to enjoy half my income go to some landleech and fund war crimes in the middle east! I can’t wait to see which climate change fueled disaster kills me, or maybe the fascist death squads will be the ones to do me in!










  • I mean, if you get into any real depth with math, you are going to reach a point where you can’t use conveniently use words to describe the symbols being manipulated.

    As an example for the math I am doing literally right now, I very much prefer using C+R compared to “semi circular arc in the upper half of the complex plane with radius R”, or M+(f(z)) which means “Maximum of the magnitude of the function f(z) over C+R”, which if I were to write out in full, would just become a clusterfuck.

    Also you still wouldn’t be able to get rid of symbols because some symbols are placeholders and straight up don’t have any meaning in natural language. This occurs often in physics as well, not just pure maths. For example, the laplace transform of any function is written as a variable of “s”, but “s” doesn’t have a clear meaning (at least as far as I know).