Why would the carrying capacity drop? The sourced article is full of unsourced prose http://www.paulchefurka.ca/CC_Overshoot.html
Sorry greenpeace, I’m an environmentalist myself, but this article is just a bunch of made up BS
Why would the carrying capacity drop? The sourced article is full of unsourced prose http://www.paulchefurka.ca/CC_Overshoot.html
Sorry greenpeace, I’m an environmentalist myself, but this article is just a bunch of made up BS
I mean yes, obviously, that’s the point of the mission?
Investigating the potential habitability of Europa is the main purpose of NASA’s Europa Clipper mission
Although I definitely like the “Captain Obvious” type headline better than the usual clickbait
I once collaborated with an exceptionally talented programmer who seemed so engrossed in his addiction that he would invent challenges where there were none, presumably to make his work more engaging and bearable. However, this often led to incomplete projects because once the stimulating aspects were finished, he struggled to find the motivation to continue. Clearly, this behavior was extreme and detrimental.
I think a lot of devs can relate to that
“In the design plans for the system, the word ‘main’ was used inconsistently between the device that sends the electric signals, and the device that receives the signals,” NASA said in a written statement. "On the signal side, ‘main’ meant the main parachute. In contrast, on the receiver side ‘main’ was used as a reference to a pyrotechnic that fires to release the parachute canister cover and deploy the drogue.
“Engineers connected the two mains, causing the parachute deployment actions to occur out of order,” NASA said.
Metal and plastic is easy, controlling cloth is hard
While we’re at it, can we please define enums for the standard logging levels in the stdlib
Not really blowing off, they just don’t have enough gravity to keep it in
sub-Neptunes are susceptible to atmospheric loss. The exoplanets can lose their atmospheres if they don’t have enough mass, and therefore enough gravitational force, to keep their atmospheres. If this theory of atmospheric loss is true and the sub-Neptunes don’t have enough mass to hold on to their atmospheres, they’d likely shrink to the size of super-Earths, explaining the size gap between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes.
So that’s why they called it FIRST
Tbf forks should be separated in the repo view on GitHub from repos you’ve created
Is it though? Has someone tried with some of the past problems?
Who cares if the program has done its job anyway
This works a lot of the time with the people that don’t really care about the review. With those that do it won’t
Focusing beyond the code - as a developer you will code 20% of your time.
Doesn’t sound like a great software engineer to me
In my company everyone is called Software Development Engineer 🤷♂️
Yeah that’s kind of what I meant. People like their days to start at the same time every day. We are creatures of habit.
These features are part of 3.11, not 3.11.7 🤦♂️