• 0 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m taking the bait.

    The art he prompted was drawn from and trained by art that wasn’t his. The art was created by unsuspecting artists and then was blundered together like a frog until it created the image. He may have edited the image later on with a 3rd party program. But that’s still altering art built from an amalgamation of others art.

    And this isn’t the same as line tracing or referencing other’s art because that still requires the user to put pen to paper and wholly create something by hand. Or hand to digital modeling software. Something that actually takes hours of work and concentration. Not coming back to your PC to change the wording in your prompt and then walk away for an hour or whatever while it blends stuff together for you.

    If the original creator of the art work should get the copyright then the thousands of artists who drew the original training material should get those copyrights.

    This is the same problem with AI in other fields. It’s drawn from the work of humans.

    Moreover, I don’t want to remove the human element from art ever.









  • Mathazzar@lemmy.worldtoRPGMemes @ttrpg.networkFight me on it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Your number 2 is based around cultural, not species differences. Two humans raised in two different cultures could end up very different.

    There could be two tribes of goblins. One that began eating people out of desperation and now just do it because it’s tradition. The other could have grown up in close relationships with their nongoblin neighbors and are seen as a valuable part of their region.

    So untying evilness to their race isn’t being race blind or pretending people down have struggles - it’s removing the shoehorning that occurred.








  • I have many negative options of this show. Ultimately, while Lucy was…okay… Norm and chet had my favorite dynamic and didn’t act like complete morons most of the time.

    They seemed to have set out with the intention of making the BoS a slapstick comedy rayher than a serious player consisting of intelligent humans. Especially Knight Titus and Maximus felt like horribly written characters.

    I understand them going for humor but… I feel the slapstick nature of it really took away my enjoyment of it.

    While fallout has had humor in it, I felt it was backseat to the actual atmosphere of its story of surviving the wasteland. In the series, slapstick seems to be all it is.

    Also I don’t understand why they added the thing about ghouls.




  • It depends. Self publishers on places like Amazon Kindle are probably making that choice themselves. They choose their own covers.

    I understand a Self publisher has less financial resources but… there’s no good answer.

    For large publishing firms, they have a choice. They pick books they think will do well and support it with cover art, marketing, etc.

    When you have things like Fallout’s TV series using AI art to market itself? That’s a multi-billion dollar company. They can afford not to. I don’t fault the writer for a book that a publisher forces AI onto, but as long as they stay with a publisher who openly forces them to use AI, I will hold my stance.


  • One bad apple ruins the bunch.

    Cosby was the titular character. His actions reflect on everyone. The supporting cast and crew did good work and were paid (hopefully fairly) for it, and I hope their efforts will always be remembered but the work is also tainted now.

    One thing I’m unsure of is if Cosby wrote any of the shows. If so, his creeping shadow gets worse because he’s a hypocrite. If not, then it’s unfortunate to the writers.

    There will never be a black or white answer in this but I have to draw lines somewhere. I don’t demonize the supporting cast, only the titular one.

    The cast can and should denounce Cosby in cases like that but… again, Apple and the bunch.