• Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 个月前

    It’s not that bizarre. They don’t have to serve you the content without showing you the ads that make the platform profitable. The freedom goes both ways. I use an ad blocker too, but I don’t think that YouTube is really doing anything wrong here. (Other than possibly ruining their own platform, but that’s their problem that they’re making for themselves.)

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 个月前

      If they weren’t a monopoly, I’d agree, they can do whatever they want.

      But since they are a monopoly, its a de facto the equivalent of a town square, and they are policing people’s speech, and broadcasting annoying public announcements that nobody wants to hear.

      • Robin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 个月前

        A privately owned platform cannot serve the public good. There will always be conflicts of interest. A proper public square should be funded by a competent government (but those are rare) or decentralized.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 个月前

      I hate the way they‘re doing it and how they push their silly premium subscription in my face whenever I open the app to look something up quick. Adblock all the way. But you‘re right. They have to make money somehow. They‘re a corporation after all. It‘s naive to think they will ever give up.

    • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 个月前

      When suggested adblock, my mother also do not convinced it’s right to use them. Basically, my mother is grateful for the service provided, and will “pay” by watching ads. I guess this one is not so clear-cut.