Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    15 hours ago

    Interesting article about netflix. I hadnā€™t really thought about the scale of their shitty forgettable movie generation, but there are apparently hundreds and hundreds of these things with big names attached and no-one watches them and no-one has heard of them and apparently Netflix doesnā€™t care about this because they can pitch magic numbers to their shareholders and everyone is happy.

    ā€œWhat are these movies?ā€ the Hollywood producer asked me. ā€œAre they successful movies? Are they not? They have famous people in them. They get put out by major studios. And yet because we donā€™t have any reliable numbers from the streamers, we actually donā€™t know how many people have watched them. So what are they? If no one knows about them, if no one saw them, are they just something that people who are in them can talk about in meetings to get other jobs? Are we all just trying to keep the ball rolling so weā€™re just getting paid and having jobs, but no oneā€™s really watching any of this stuff? When does the bubble burst? No one has any fucking clue.ā€

    What a colossal waste of money, brains, time and talent. I can see who the market for stuff like sora is, now.

    https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-49/essays/casual-viewing/

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      6 hours ago

      I feel like before Redbox went under, it was also a dumping ground for this sort of thing. For instance, that mid-budget Western ā€œRustā€ where Alec Baldwin killed the camerawoman on set felt like it was destined for this sort of distribution strategy. Whoā€™s clamoring to go out to the theater to see a Western with Alec Baldwin these days? But it might stand out among all the other slop when youā€™re looking to turn your brain off on a Saturday night.

      See also the rise of the ā€œgeezer-teasers,ā€ where a random 80s/90s action star signs up to appear in the first and last 10 minutes of a generic action movie filmed someplace inexpensive, most likely eastern Europe or southeast Asia. There were a lot of those. Perhaps my favorite, that I still want to watch someday, was Danny Trejo and Danny Glover in ā€œBad-Ass 2: Bad-Asses.ā€