• Kaboom@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not actually. I’m saying even if they were understaffed and untrained, I’d expect better response times

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Cant have better response times if theres literally no one available in the first place. What point are you trying to make?

        The conservative government for the last decade or more has massively cut NHS funding. Resulting in cases like this.

        • Kaboom@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          Except there was people available. She just wasn’t prioritized. That’s why it made the news

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            You seem to be using a definition of “available” that’s different from everyone else.

            When they say “available”, it means someone who is not actively doing something. A paramedic who’s tending to another patient is not an available paramedic.