• SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, most products and components go through multiple revisions to account for either flaws in the original design or to comply with local laws (for example, health and safety requirements that did not exist at time of original design). I believe it’s imperative for every business to keep on top of these things…but perhaps I’m a bit naive.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure, but then those new revisions that are currently being sold are what get updated. That’s perfectly reasonable. We don’t require physical products to go back and fix the old stuff they are no longer selling. If we said that a vacuum manufacturer has to go back and fix their old products for safety flaws to comply with modern standards, what about a company that has been around for 100 years? Do they have to go back and design and manufacture modern technology into those products that didn’t exist when they were made? What if only one person in the whole world is actually using that product anymore? How long do they need to continue to revise the product?

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just wait, someday there will be 3d printers that can assemble individual elements and then we can print off any old machine we like

        • irotsoma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s already the case with a lot of things. I have a 3D scanner and printer for fixing things. Just the materials are limited to plastics that don’t need to take on load bearing tasks. I could use stronger plastics, though, if I was willing to deal with the fumes.