• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is fine to me… 2026 is the year I start looking to replace my M1. I usually go 5-7 years between refreshes.

    • 2001aCentenaryofFederation@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      yeah this news is only disappointing for people who buy new computers every year (is that even a thing?). Whatever upgrades it has will also feature the last 4+ years of updates, so to someone coming from an M4 yeah yikes. But for my m1 max? it will be noticeable.

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The only upgrade that matters for most non-gaming or video production use cases any more is RAM anyway.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          True… I still regularly use my 2008 17” MBP and it’s always the RAM that’s the limiting factor.

          • realitista@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            My 2018 Mac mini (the last model with upgradable ram) has 64gb and it’s way faster than any m4 without 64gb. I will keep it until it’s completely untenable to do so. Minimum 10 years, I’m hoping I can manage 15-20. Maybe by then I’ll actually be able to afford a new Mac with 64gb or more.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sounds like it will be the same as the last, small incremental upgrades. That’s perfectly fine, every release of mostly anything doesn’t need to be massive overhauls.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Agreed. A massive overhaul just introduces more problems. I wish they did the same with the OS updates.