• Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I say this as someone who likes fediverse microblogging (Mastodon, MissKey, etc) it will never be Mastodon. Mastodon and its maintainers are staunchly against all the things that would make it a viable replacement to Twitter.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          They don’t like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.

          That’s all I’ve got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it’s pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It’s insane that companies haven’t jumped on it.

          You don’t even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            This is what happens when someone can’t put themselves into their user’s shoes and then wonder why a product isn’t doing as well as it is.

            They proclaim the product is great, it’s everyone else that’s the problem

    • icogniito@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actually not a bummer in my opinion, let people sort into different platforms based on their interests like we used to do with forums.

      A fragmented internet is a better internet

      • Cordinel@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        But it’s not fragmented. Mastodon is still the odd “vegan” option while BlueSky is becoming the main Twitterlike platform. Mastodon is still coming out the other end mostly the same.

        • icogniito@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, and that’s a good thing specially for the reason I just mentioned

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I somewhat agree, but it’s not going to happen. If Bluesky wins this battle, they’re just going to be the dominant platform. It’s not going to spread out. It’s just going to migrate. A federated alternative would at least be spread out by design, though connected still.

      • sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        that’s not how the modern internet works and unfortunately i am forced to be on facebook because all 4 hobbies no longer exists outside of it.

        if people moved to the fediverse instead of bluesky or such, then we’d actually be able to have a fragmented internet again - due to how the fediverse interconnects through federation.

        which i think is the best selling point the fediverse have - no longer would users need to be on multiple services, they could just be on one, and still interact with the services across the fediverse. but unless there is a mass-migration of one single service to the fediverse, such as people choosing mastodon over bluesky, to be the dominant service - it’s just never going to happen.