• Max@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The other option is that they simultaneously believe they need your vote, but also know that they would lose more voters than they would gain if they did what you’re asking. It’s not entirely clear that this is what’s happening, as there’s not been much indication that Kamala believes what Israel is doing is horrific, but it’s a very real possibility that you aren’t including. And in that case, voting for her remains the best you can do, since you not voting for her won’t convince the other people who’s vote she would lose. It will just lead to trump being elected.

    • sandbox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Some people, myself included, have principles which prevent them from voting for a genocidal candidate, even in a first past the post system where the other candidate is more genocidal.

      There’s very little point in trying to convince people who have a moral objection against supporting genocide to support genocide.

      Like, y’all could have a whole people-led movement to elect a third party if you really wanted to, and if nothing else it would maybe put pressure on the Democrats to stop supporting genocide, but you’re so fucking brainwashed into believing that a third party will never matter that you’re incapable of even conceiving the thought.