Vladimir Putin missed the G20 summit in India, avoiding any risk of criminal detention under an ICC arrest warrant.

Brazilā€™s Lula backtracks on Putin arrest safety at Rio G20

Putin missed the G20 summit in India, avoiding any risk of criminal detention under an ICC warrant for alleged war crimes.

Published On 11 Sep 202311 Sep 2023

Brazilā€™s leader has withdrawn his personal assurance that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not be arrested if he attends next yearā€™s Group of 20 summit in Rio de Janeiro, saying it would be up to the judiciary to decide.

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva also questioned Brazilā€™s membership in the United Nations war crimes court, saying on Monday ā€œemerging countries often sign things that are detrimental to themā€.

ā€œI want to know why we are members but not the United States, not Russia, not India, not China,ā€ Lula said. ā€œIā€™m not saying Iā€™m going to leave the court. I just want to know why Brazil is a signatory.ā€

Putin missed this yearā€™s G20 gathering in the Indian capital, New Delhi, avoiding possible political opprobrium and any risk of criminal detention under an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant.

In March, the ICC announced an arrest warrant for Putin over the war crime accusation of unlawfully deporting Ukrainian children. The Kremlin denies the accusations insisting the warrant against Putin is ā€œvoidā€.

Russia issued an arrest warrant for Karim Khan, the prosecutor at The Hague-based war crimes court, in May and he was added to the ā€œwanted listā€ of its Ministry of Internal Affairs.

ā€˜The judiciary decidesā€™

Brazil is a signatory to the Rome Statute, which led to the founding of the ICC. Lula raised eyebrows at the weekend when he told Indian news network Firstpost: ā€œIf Iā€™m the president of Brazil and if he [Putin] comes to Brazil, thereā€™s no way that he will be arrested.ā€

He changed tack on Monday at a press conference in Brazil telling reporters: ā€œI donā€™t know if Brazilā€™s justice will detain him. Itā€™s the judiciary that decides, itā€™s not the government.ā€

Putin has skipped recent international gatherings and sent his Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to New Delhi instead for the September 9-10 G20 meeting, even though India is not an ICC signatory.

On Saturday, the G20 nations adopted a declaration that avoided condemning Moscow for the war in Ukraine but called on all states to refrain from using force to grab territory.

The next summit is slated for November 2024 in Rio de Janeiro and Lula said he hoped ā€œby then the war is overā€.

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
          121Ā·
          1 year ago

          Thatā€™s why itā€™s gitmo. Itā€™s not under US law. If it was those prisoners would have other kinds of rights that we donā€™t want them to have.

          Last US War crime I can remember was Clint Lorance who k I liked some Afgan villagers. He was serving a 19 year sentance, and was pardoned by Trump.

            • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
              111Ā·
              1 year ago

              I didnā€™t say it was okay. But I do understand it. We call them unlawful combatants. That is a specific term akin to pirate. You can, by law, do anything you want to a pirate on the high seas. They have no rights. Thatā€™s old British law and international law. So, by calling them that we imprisoned them in a place not in this country so they would have no rights. US laws do not apply. Screwed up? SURE.

              • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                9Ā·
                1 year ago

                Dude, I understand the logic behind Gitmo, we have all had 20 years to figure it out. Thatā€™s not the point. You said we are in line with a International laws, but we bend and break them at will constantly, because the US can essentially shrug and go ā€œwhat are you gonna do about it?ā€ We do it all the time. We are seen as one notch better than a schoolyard bully by many countries. Gitmo is grey area at best partially because we would never let another country do that to our citizens.